You must log in or register to see images
Doesn't matter who they pick. England will never win in my lifetime. They'll wait until I die and then start winning everything.
You must log in or register to see images
A pub has announced it will boycott the upcoming World Cup in Qatar due to concerns over the host country's LGBTQ+ rights record.
The Liverpool Arms on Northgate Street, Chester, has said that it will not be showing any of the matches, due to the host nation's "well-documented" approach.
Good on them,might have to pop there when out in Chester next time.

Doesn't matter who they pick. England will never win in my lifetime. They'll wait until I die and then start winning everything.
I'm from Edge Hill originally but now live in West Cheshire not that scruffy East side of Cheshire phnar phnar.Because people from Cheshire are the classiest in the world.![]()

Was never going to happen.
But can you just imagine the statement it would have made if even 1 of the big teams had come out and say nope we aren’t going.
Fifa would prob threaten them with bans but it would at least be a start.
A bit like the super league, I’m sure once one team withdrew there would be more following suit so not to look the bad guy.
It'd show up FIFA though. let them threaten.
the fact not one single solitary player was willing to "not go" say something imo.
Stop pretending they care about causes. you've been shown up fully.
do not dare go play, celebrate goals ,have a great time then come home and start bad mouthing. that's pure hypocrisy imo.
I tend to agree with you on most things, but I'm not sure on this one, but it's a debate, and we're all entitled to our opinions.Bullshit. No player is going to do that, the World Cup is the pinnacle of their careers, few are lucky enough to play in one.
Nor should it be up to the players to make the stance.
I tend to agree with you on most things, but I'm not sure on this one, but it's a debate, and we're all entitled to our opinions.
Mine is that players can make a stand if they choose, they don't need to be led. To say it's the pinnacle of their careers is saying they're putting that career before the principles they generally claim to espouse (some of them), so the same could then be said of the various football associations - they all want to be part of the world's biggest football competition too.
As I said on the LFC For Sale thread - we're all of us guilty of hypocrisy to some degree and I don't want to be all self-righteous about it, but it's the individual player's choice if he decides to go or not, they can't conveniently shift the blame onto others.
I'm just putting myself in their position. A life long dream to play in a world cup versus a moral stance that, in reality, won't really achieve anything. Rightly or wrongly (clearly wrongly), it'll all be forgotten about in 6wks time regardless of the actions you may or may not choose to take.
I don't agree with the world cup being Qatar, and I haven't done from the very beginning, but it's too late to do anything now. And Qatar aren't going to change their ways because a few footballers didn't kick a ball, only way ther protest works is if ALL the footballers going to the world cup refuse to play and that's never going to happen.
(Note what I was responding to too)
It might make them think twice before awarding it to another country with poor human rights record who will then make millions if not billions off hosting it while paying awful money to those to building the infrastructure to host said games.

Obviously. Now re-read what I said
You need the majority of 832 players to take a stance (and give up their dream) for it to work
Bullshit. No player is going to do that, the World Cup is the pinnacle of their careers, few are lucky enough to play in one.
Nor should it be up to the players to make the stance.
We've discussed this before - the best time to act may have been then, but it wasn't the only time. Nothing was done then, but it could have been done since and still can be now.I go back to what Klopp said, the time to act was 12 years ago when it was awarded, if not then, there have been all the years in between then and now and nobody has said or done anything. It doesn't make it alright not to speak out now but why weren't those who are now calling out players and managers not calling out the football authorities long ago?
Some of the players going to the WC would have been very small children and the rest would have still been at school at the time it was awarded. Maybe the adults in the room should have done something so they didn't have this moral dilemma now.
We've discussed this before - the best time to act may have been then, but it wasn't the only time. Nothing was done then, but it could have been done since and still can be now.
As you point out, some of the players would have been children at the time it was agreed, so couldn't do anything then - nothing's stopping them now.
Something could be done right up until the last minute - the players could turn out at then sit down at the kick-off and refuse to participate, or any number of demonstrations of disapprobation.
If they wanted to, and this is my point.
As I've said, there are differing points of view, and I'm not saying mine is universally correct, but laying the blame on others in the past is a cheap get-out, if anyone wants to do something they still can.
Klopp is a great guy and a decent human being, but it doesn't mean his every utterance is Gospel - I don't agree with him here.
You highlighted part of my post and addressed it by saying the same thing I'd said in the next part of my post.We've discussed this before - the best time to act may have been then, but it wasn't the only time. Nothing was done then, but it could have been done since and still can be now.
As you point out, some of the players would have been children at the time it was agreed, so couldn't do anything then - nothing's stopping them now.
Something could be done right up until the last minute - the players could turn out at then sit down at the kick-off and refuse to participate, or any number of demonstrations of disapprobation.
If they wanted to, and this is my point.
As I've said, there are differing points of view, and I'm not saying mine is universally correct, but laying the blame on others in the past is a cheap get-out, if anyone wants to do something they still can.
Klopp is a great guy and a decent human being, but it doesn't mean his every utterance is Gospel - I don't agree with him here.