I think the finance questions were fairly meh. The answers were either "trust us we're doing things properly" or "it's more complicated than the questioner thinks", there's not really any more insight into the types of thing that will cause fans to worry. These are questions the club hand picked, why would you choose to answer a question that you can't give a straight, helpful answer to?
There was a question of how many people are in the "key management personnel" category in the accounts (for whom pay isn't disclosed) and what do they do? The answer is simply "I can't disclose individual wages" - but that wasn't the question at all.
Few "high"-lights:
- Can we spend in January? Not without selling or "alternative financing".
- Safe Standing - out to tender, aim to have rail seating in place by 2024/25, following a full fan consultation. Not budgeted for yet.
- Stadium Development: No firm plans in place yet, feasibility studies ongoing.
- Highest priced season tickets in the division are justified due to supply and demand. Club believe price is fair. 13th highest when in the Premier League.
- Clear plan for the fans? Read the financial report.
- Happy with disconnect between club and fans? "Overplayed by social and through the media". Fans are supporting the club because they keep turning up. Doesn't believe it's the case that there's a disconnect. Fans haven't given players the backing to win games at times.
- Scared of facing journalists? Club have changed stance due to a break of trust. Proud of in-house content/channels. "All about engagement and making sure fans feel connected in other ways".
Assuming this is faithful reporting from DH (and I have high regard for DH's posts, so I'm sure it is), the last two bullet points are disgusting. Presumably the club have decided to take this policy towards the fans and local media from on high (i.e. Webber). He has turned from being a great asset to being a huge weight dragging us down. For the good of the club, he really needs to go.

