The carried over thread...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
steverico said:
No because he was proven to be a mass murderer, Meghan has stuff made up about her every day, some **** rag reporters opinion, there are many people who worked with her on Suits, have said she was a very nice person and nothing like the image projected by the MSN, but they don’t report that because that wouldn’t appeal to their racist readers.
Click to expand...

Others have said differently. Which to believe? I thought Ben was the one who viewed everything through the prism of racism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: springtiger
LeftSaidFred said:
Let’s be honest, Meghan has ****ed her way to the top, she ain’t the first and she sure as hell won’t be the last. ****ing a Prince and maintaining it is pretty impressive for her type however, so hats off to her for that.

And it seriously has nothing to do with ethnicity.
Click to expand...

After listening to royalist ****ers wax lyrical about ‘showing respect’ to the royals during this sycophantic cringefest for over a week, this post referring to the wife of a royal prince and mother of his children is peak irony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mckechnie Orange
LeftSaidFred said:
Oh agreed compared to someone like Fergie who has no known skills, other than sucking toes. She’s still a grifter though. Sort of an alternate Kamala Harris, same mindset, different arena.
Click to expand...
See having a go at another woman of colour, what about Carrie Johnson, shagged a married man, ended up getting her wedding paid for by Bamford,? No outrage there? Why? Cos she’s white.
 
The new King’s an adulterer, his brother’s a nonce but the real scumbag is the black American woman because she uh.. I forgot, what did she do wrong again that stirred so much hatred?
 
Kalman said:
After listening to royalist ****ers wax lyrical about ‘showing respect’ to the royals during this sycophantic cringefest for over a week, this post referring to the wife of a royal prince and mother of his children is peak irony.
Click to expand...

As ironic as the numerous 'British' nationalists wishing ill on the 'Scottish' one.

Just comes down to your side of the fence I suppose - for what it's worth I'm a unionist but on balance, quite like the social policy north of the border.
As someone who's quite ambivalent to the monarchy I have more respect for the ones buggering off and earning their own living rather than the taxpayer funding mansions and lifestyles for dozens of them and the majority just cut ribbons (and somehow still get themselves into bother) in return.

Anyways, I'd better shut up on the matter otherwise Chazz will be accusing me of claiming an 'in' at Buck House or something.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kalman and steverico
Mckechnie Orange said:
As is the numerous 'British' nationalists wishing ill on the 'Scottish' one.

Just comes down to your side of the fence, but as someone ambivalent to the monarchy I have more respect for the ones ****ing off and earning their own living rather than the taxpayer fu ding mansions for dozens of them and the majority just cut ribbons in return.
Click to expand...
All this “Service “ the Queen gave to the country, let’s be fair, she opened things, that was it, and did **** all to earn it, other than being born to another Royal
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalman
didn't the queen declare two of her cousins were dead but really hidden away in a home due to disabilities?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalman
Mckechnie Orange said:
As ironic as the numerous 'British' nationalists wishing ill on the 'Scottish' one.

Just comes down to your side of the fence I suppose - for what it's worth I'm a unionist but on balance, quite like the social policy north of the border, but as someone ambivalent to the monarchy I have more respect for the ones ****ing off and earning their own living rather than the taxpayer funding mansions and lifestyles for dozens of them and the majority just cut ribbons (and get into bother) in return.
Click to expand...

But the only reason Meghan and Harry are getting a fortune is because he is a member of the Royal Family. How much do you think Netflix and the rest would pay an unemployed ex serviceman in his late thirties married to a z list actress?
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Ex Aberdeen now E.R., StCloudTiger and LeftSaidFred
bradymk2 said:
didn't the queen declare two of her cousins were dead but really hidden away in a home due to disabilities?
Click to expand...
Somebody did, right set of caring ****ers aren’t they, Charlie sacking all his workers was a good one as well, , she also negotiated with the Tories so that they don’t have to pay Inheritance tax, I wonder if the Nonce will have to pay tax on the gift that his mummy gave him, to pay off his accuser?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalman
steverico said:
All this “Service “ the Queen gave to the country, let’s be fair, she opened things, that was it, and did **** all to earn it, other than being born to another Royal
Click to expand...

I think in her understanding of the word, she served to the best of her ability, and generally did a cracking job.

There is no perfect constitution, but we felt less like a democracy to me in the last dozen days. I hope Charlie upholds the pledge he made to parliament and neutrality in the coming years.

There's not a democratic majority for abolishion, so I respect that despite my misgivings over aspects of birthright. I also accept that presidential style democracies also have their own drawbacks.

In short, what I'm trying to say is that I don't really care, and don't really see why we've been subject to a 10 day brainwashing media campaign when life goes on. It's sad, but it's not such a surprise when people in their 90's pass away.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Evington, steverico, Idi Amin and 2 others
steverico said:
No I don’t, I don’t really have an opinion on her, apart from being a looker, I object to the hatred of her, by you, and the press
Click to expand...

For some reason people nowadays describe anything less than fulsome praise as hatred. I would be happy to have the media a Meghan free zone. And that goes for all the other royals and the vacuous celebrities which occupy acres of space in the papers.
She doesn’t look too bad but her legs are way too thin, like matchsticks. There again my ideal woman was Julie Christie and she was on the slim side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back