The carried over thread...

Others have said differently. Which to believe? I thought Ben was the one who viewed everything through the prism of racism.

 

Duly amended.

 

After listening to royalist ****ers wax lyrical about ‘showing respect’ to the royals during this sycophantic cringefest for over a week, this post referring to the wife of a royal prince and mother of his children is peak irony.

 

See having a go at another woman of colour, what about Carrie Johnson, shagged a married man, ended up getting her wedding paid for by Bamford,? No outrage there? Why? Cos she’s white.

 

Yes. It is there in print.

 

The new King’s an adulterer, his brother’s a nonce but the real scumbag is the black American woman because she uh.. I forgot, what did she do wrong again that stirred so much hatred?

 

Well the way you have set your opinion on her you obviously believe the UK press

 

As ironic as the numerous 'British' nationalists wishing ill on the 'Scottish' one.

Just comes down to your side of the fence I suppose - for what it's worth I'm a unionist but on balance, quite like the social policy north of the border.
As someone who's quite ambivalent to the monarchy I have more respect for the ones buggering off and earning their own living rather than the taxpayer funding mansions and lifestyles for dozens of them and the majority just cut ribbons (and somehow still get themselves into bother) in return.

Anyways, I'd better shut up on the matter otherwise Chazz will be accusing me of claiming an 'in' at Buck House or something.

 

I've got a feeling it'll be closed, either by the Netherlands mongrel or Morphy Richards rider.

 

All this “Service “ the Queen gave to the country, let’s be fair, she opened things, that was it, and did **** all to earn it, other than being born to another Royal

 

And you believe what you have read elsewhere.

 

I'm keeping a close eye on my shares in a blood pressure treatment company.

 

No I don’t, I don’t really have an opinion on her, apart from being a looker, I object to the hatred of her, by you, and the press

 

didn't the queen declare two of her cousins were dead but really hidden away in a home due to disabilities?

 

But the only reason Meghan and Harry are getting a fortune is because he is a member of the Royal Family. How much do you think Netflix and the rest would pay an unemployed ex serviceman in his late thirties married to a z list actress?

 

Somebody did, right set of caring ****ers aren’t they, Charlie sacking all his workers was a good one as well, , she also negotiated with the Tories so that they don’t have to pay Inheritance tax, I wonder if the Nonce will have to pay tax on the gift that his mummy gave him, to pay off his accuser?

 

I think in her understanding of the word, she served to the best of her ability, and generally did a cracking job.

There is no perfect constitution, but we felt less like a democracy to me in the last dozen days. I hope Charlie upholds the pledge he made to parliament and neutrality in the coming years.

There's not a democratic majority for abolishion, so I respect that despite my misgivings over aspects of birthright. I also accept that presidential style democracies also have their own drawbacks.

In short, what I'm trying to say is that I don't really care, and don't really see why we've been subject to a 10 day brainwashing media campaign when life goes on. It's sad, but it's not such a surprise when people in their 90's pass away.

 

For some reason people nowadays describe anything less than fulsome praise as hatred. I would be happy to have the media a Meghan free zone. And that goes for all the other royals and the vacuous celebrities which occupy acres of space in the papers.
She doesn’t look too bad but her legs are way too thin, like matchsticks. There again my ideal woman was Julie Christie and she was on the slim side.

 

MODS! MODS! MODS!

 

please log in to view this image