I've not followed it in that much detail tbh but I see what you mean. It depends on russian civilian casualties as that could backfire in terms of their ppl actually supporting Putin's narrative and wider general public opinion. Also depends on what the U.S. authorises and how far the West is prepared to go and how much we arm them. Especially when they need those weapons in the Donbas to try to push the russians back. Their priority seems to be defending Odessa atm watching the news.
Lol, **** off man. Wouldn't I be commenting on troop movements and battery positions then? Or am I commenting on the current state of the conflict and the way Ukraine are best to move based on how the news has been portraying this conflict. In fact, echoing the points already made by commentators far more educated in this field than both you and I. Or should we all post "reckons we keep outta that one" on every single thread like?
We should definitely keep out of this one. But if you feel happy parroting half digested NATO propaganda fed to the press by war departments in Washington and Westminster, knock yourself out mate.
I reckon if you could post one thing on here without coming across as a condescending **** 24/7, you'd maybe hit the mark. You've had a preconceived notion of me for ages on here, culminating in you a few times presuming my agenda or beliefs and being just blatantly wrong and looking a tit. So back to my original point, back to bed Archers.
Sorry, can’t help myself; I appear to have been born with the smart arse gene. However, in the great scheme of things I know as much about most things as any other ****er does, and that amounts to the square root of ****all, so feel free to ignore me. I ignore myself most of the time tbh.
Just came in to see if we won yet and got this massive winner instead Har har please log in to view this image
Ive not seen any of this bullying from Archers on you 1st hand but rest assured welshie if you need help we can help you.
