British Politics spam thread
- Thread starter HRH Custard VC
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
True.
To do that would require people being prepared to make concessions like:
- to concede that they may not be totally correct,
- to concede that the other person may have a point
- to conceded that their version of other people could be wrong
- to actually think for themselves, rather than just parroting whatever ideology they were taught.
You have to listen to the 'other side' if you want to move onwards and hopefully upwards. You can't understand what you ignore. As much as I don't like Ben 'my wife is a doctor' Shapiro he does make some good points. Not to Andrew Neil obvs.
"Strangers in the Night" 
Ignoring the word politics, you have just summed up Dull in a single post. I think I’m going to like you being around
Why she thought she could out psyche a psychologist, especially one like him says a lot for her arrogance. I did see a conversation between Peterson and Mat Dillahunty, and Dillahunty made Peterson look quite lightweight. Then again, it was a fairly loaded topic, as Peterson was effectively tasked with proving God exists, and that's pretty much Mat's stock in trade. It was interesting all the same.
Andrew the lefty?
I tend to seek out views that oppose my initial perception just to see if there's a better or alternative way of viewing things. If you don't know where someone is arguing from, it's difficult to get a decent level of engagement, especially as some fields of study have different meanings for some words and phrases.
He's taken a leaf out if Sowell's book. Keep calm, use facts.
I did see a conversation between Peterson and Mat Dillahunty, and Dillahunty made Peterson look quite lightweight. Then again, it was a fairly loaded topic, as Peterson was effectively tasked with proving God exists, and that's pretty much Mat's stock in trade. It was interesting all the same.
He reads the other person so well, as you'd expect, so he knows pretty much where they're heading, often before they do.
Thick ****s like treble used to try squealing 'racist' in every reply, until they realised how stupid they looked when they couldn't back it up, so they think going for the next most 'offensive' word in their lexicon will have some effect.
What they fail to factor in, is that few if any have any respect for them or their opinion, so it's just a duck farting in the wind.
They've followed us here, which suggests they care, we've never asked to go back to safespace, and haven't bothered with it since the bans were lifted, which demonstrates who is hanging on whose word.
Crack on ya desperate ****wits. Your usual reply to a post like this is to claim it's long so must be a meltdown.
Too easy.
@Charlie1 
QED. 
"Too easy" = a fortnight or more of begging for attention, to try to regain some credibility after almost a decade of **** ups.
QED. "Too easy" = a fortnight or more of begging for attention, to try to regain some credibility after almost a decade of **** ups.
I wouldn't wish the outcome of that on anyone tbf, not even Dull.
I just hope when the time comes he puts down the gun and seeks counselling instead
