No. If we are signing attacking full backs we won’t play this formation. Also Paquetá has said he wants to play CM
Nope it would be a 4-3-3.This however brings up a problem. How to put this without sounding like someone we all know and love? Okay. I am led to believe that an agreement is in place with Lucas Paquetta and his party for a transfer to NUFC. As in contract, terms etc are agreed. However, this was allowed to occur as he fell out with the Lyon coach because he played him as a false 9 and Paqueta feels he operates better as a central midfielder. The problem however is that someone at NUFC believes he would play best in the false 9 role too. A fee with Lyon is not agreed at this point and the 2 parties are some way off with the valuation. Like ****ing miles off as is typical with Lyon's president. NUFC have an absolute top price that they will not go 1 penny over. Paqueta was however dropped and not played in their final game last weekend after his little trip. This thing is likely to rumble on all the way through the window would be my guess.
I dunno, they like their marquee big name signings to make a statement, hence Man City going straight for Haarland, Chelsea with Lukaku etc. Which makes me think Nunez will be a very tough one for us.
Lodi would be an amazing signing. Would make me rethink our budget! Massive step up from Targett, although admittedly I'd have been over the moon if we'd signed him permanently