No Barbet or Dickie, Wallace or Hendrick
May miss Barbet.
Not the others imo.
No Barbet or Dickie, Wallace or Hendrick
But we may not relish the inclusion of Sanderson though ColMay miss Barbet.
Not the others imo.
But we may not relish the inclusion of Sanderson though Col
Could be 4 2 3 1 which I think is, or at least was Warburton's formation of choice.Possibly 4141 with that line up or 4132 with chair tucking in behind Dykes and by that I mean nor being 30 yards away from him....
C'mon Rangers
Possibly 4141 with that line up or 4132 with chair tucking in behind Dykes and by that I mean nor being 30 yards away from him....
C'mon Rangers
May miss Barbet.
Not the others imo.
Could be any number of formations.
No Barbet or Dickie, Wallace or Hendrick
Could be any number of formations.
Possibly 4141 with that line up or 4132 with chair tucking in behind Dykes and by that I mean nor being 30 yards away from him....
C'mon Rangers
Warburton thinks we could nick it with 4 or 5 wins, because the contenders have to play each other I guess. Way our luck and form is, it's not looking too likely.As long as it's not 550 and we give it a right go......
6 wins could still nick 6th spot.... long shot I know and I wouldn't risk a £ on it.....
I'll go 4 2 3 1 with Field and Dozzell the 2, and Amos, Johansen and Chair the 3. Hopefully with the backs providing the width and some crosses.I'll go for 4-3-2-1 with Johansen and Chair behind Dykes.
Are they injured or is it “something else”?