I dont doubt mate but i think the concentration is on the people in power and not those that arent in power.
Off Topic The Politics Thread
- Thread starter Stroller
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
He broke the guidelines as did Jezza, the Luton Mayor and many others. This was from all parties. My point is, don’t be a hypocrite and knock someone when you have broken rules yourself. there will be stories coming out soon regarding Labour and their conduct. I noticed Rayner was quite yesterday.
This is such a nonsense argument. So only people who have stayed 100% within the ever-changing rules can criticise the constant rule-breaking of those actually in charge? The useless **** was swanning around a hospital (to avoid scrutiny for that week’s **** up) unmasked despite multiple requests to put one on a couple of weeks ago.
Actually Unlike others (not mentioning names) I have been fair.
I was first to call Hancock a tw#t after the tears and affair. I called Cummings a muppet for Barnard Castle and Gove a ‘Prat’ for defending him with that glasses line. I referred to Williamson as an ‘inexperienced idiot’ and called May ‘weak’ and Boris to slow to act. All Tories!
I think I have been quite fair in my comments.
How many condemned Jezza? How many have said Starmer is dull as dishwater?
You see, to me (after googling it) kker starmer standing less than 2m away from someone isnt quite as newsworthy as lets say, holding a xmas party whilst the rest of the country are instructed not to. Its also a tad less corrupt than an mp lobbying on behalf of a company he gets paid from for governmemt contracts, then trying to cover that up and change the rules.
But i do agree, if Starmer was less than 2m away from that person then it was wrong and broke the rules, what would you suggest his punishment should be or should have been?
But i do agree, if Starmer was less than 2m away from that person then it was wrong and broke the rules, what would you suggest his punishment should be or should have been?
What’s silly about calling you out for your constant defending of the indefensible?
Whats anything got to do with Corbyn, you really need to get over this obsession mate. As for Starmer, give me someone as dull as dishwater over a lying, corrupt puppet any day of the week.
Maybe try not being a hypocrite when people from your own party have broken rules. Same as Boris mate… he wasn’t there as Starmer wasn’t at Jezza’s
Like ive said many times before, it all boils down to morals and values. Some people obviously encourage, support and defend lies, acts of corruption and the like as being fine. Others think these things are wrong and not what a civilised society should be built on. Each to their own though.
Corbyn was the ex leader and a standing MP. Some still like and follow him. He broke the rules
I dont belong to a party mate. as for youre other sentence, you must be in receipt of some facts that the rest of us arent privelaged to see.
Did you not see my response. All currently suspended, charged or under investigation. No cover ups going on, no trying to change the rules. See the difference??
I have just heard some interesting information but I won’t commit until I know it is fact… it does seem a bit suspect tbh.
Apparently LGBTQIA is increasingly unacceptable (shame because it just rolled off the tongue - not). We have to wait on the latest recommendation with trepidation of getting anything wrong and being offensive
There is of course the option to just not make a massive deal of it as it won’t affect your life whatsoever.
I only heard today that a very popular chroryographer lost her job because of her views at a party. It's getting ridiclous now.