Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
It was in the Express! If the Express is now admitting how **** Brexit is, things must be even worse than we thought.

Meanwhile, when asked why the US had lifted tariffs on steel exports from the EU, but not on those from the UK, International Trade Secretary, Anne-MarieTrevelyan (me neither) said the US chose to have a discussion with the EU first because it was a larger trading partner. Go figure.
Is that why the US has overtaken the EU as the main destination for financial services exports from the city? Or that China has overtaken the US as the EUs biggest trading partner?
You are sounding more desperate these days Stroller. I'm awaiting one of your fantastic predictions for the future elections.
 
After all the hypocrites were out in force yesterday it’s nice to see people pointing out some facts.
 
Is that why the US has overtaken the EU as the main destination for financial services exports from the city? Or that China has overtaken the US as the EUs biggest trading partner?
You are sounding more desperate these days Stroller. I'm awaiting one of your fantastic predictions for the future elections.

OK, here you go....

The Tories will lose North Shropshire.
Johnson will go before the end of 2022.
The Tories won't get an overall majority in the next GE.
You will be the last person in the UK to admit that Brexit was a mistake.
 
Ignore this, just using the board to clear my head.

Just given myself a little antidote to all this crap by reminding myself that we are all victims of hypernormalisation. We know our politicians aren’t in control, we know they lie to us to give the impression that they are in control, and we go along with it, because the alternative - radical change - is just too scary to contemplate.

But will hypernormalisation keep the floodwaters back? There are now millions of people who know that the old promise of capitalism and it’s modesty screen liberal democracy isn’t working for them. It was meant to make their lives better and it isn’t, but it is conspicuously enriching some people. Capitalism/democracy doesn’t offer anything more than the possibility (no guarantee) of material improvement and a kind of ersatz individual freedom (within very strict limits unless you can buy your way out of them), no visions of something better to aim for collectively, no sense of belonging. The terrifying ideologies of left and right provide that vision, but always with the caveat that many will need to be forced to obey in order to deliver the bliss of the vision. I thought these old ideologies were dying, like old religions, that the void of fake individualism had won, but now I’m not so sure, many people betrayed by capitalism/democracy yearn for a vision. At the moment visions promised from the right seem more likely to gain followers, but ultimately they have the same impact as ideas from the left.

So, continue as we are, hypernormally, try to tinker with capitalism/democracy to make it limp on and hope that we are improving lives for everyone, go back to the old promised land ideologies, or try to imagine something new?

Keep your eyes on the middle class, the ones who have done alright economically. If some of them start attaching themselves to big ideas, even involving sacrificing some of the things they have got, then change might actually happen.

Or the whole thing might just be a con. Politicians of whatever breed are only there to make us angry, to generate clicks and posts, to add to the coffers of the tech companies…….

No answers here, at least in terms of politics. Adam Curtis has a lot to answer for…..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Stroller
Did you know about all that?
Because I didn't, so someone has kept that quiet. What about all this 'one rule for them'?
I think the clue is in the headline mate. All been suspended, charged disciplined etc as they should be, as everyone should, or you can choose to try cover something up, change the rules to suit or lie.
 
I do think the point has been spectacularly missed or maybe just a little jest on someones part. Correct me if im wrong but if someone does something that breaks the rules/laws/guidelines and gets away with it then thats when it becomes 'one rule for some'. When they get punished then they are in the 'same rules for all' category. Hope that explains it