Why is McCann still here

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Why should he have to walk away from a job because absolute thundercunts abuse his family online?

He shouldn't. He should walk because he isn't up to it. But! I understand why he will not put himself out of a job. He isn't helping himself though. The owner should make the call. I know that is funny.
 
I think we are a joke of a club.

Thanks for reading my post.

I don't give a **** about Derby.


So no reason given for us being 'a joke of a club'?

Sounds like the type of RL banter you used to hear in the pubs of Hull in the early 80s
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Evington
Genuine question, I didn't see the game. How did we manage to put 4 past Preston? Were they that bad, even worse that Peterboro, or did we do something right?
I suppose it was a total fluke. Just like Middlesbrough.

We did have the rub of the green at Deepdale. We played better on Wednesday and ended up losing. Funny old game.
 
Out of order, no. Unhelpful in the last 20 mins, yes. When you're chasing an equaliser and you see the players heads drop isn't exactly going to inspire them either.

Why would you deny paying supporters the right to vent their feelings? I wasn't chanting by tthe way, I was sat in silence in W11, watching the demise of another match, wondering if we might grab an equaliser, knowing deep down , we don't have the players, the guile the nouse to do it.
 
I suppose it was a total fluke. Just like Middlesbrough.

We did have the rub of the green at Deepdale. We played better on Wednesday and ended up losing. Funny old game.

The 2 wins and 3 creditable draws we've had are no more flukes than the 8 defeats are bad luck.

Luck can affect the outcome of individual games, but when you're over a quarter of the season in and in the bottom 3 then it isn't down to bad luck.
 
Last edited:
Why would you deny paying supporters the right to vent their feelings? I wasn't chanting by tthe way, I was sat in silence in W11, watching the demise of another match, wondering if we might grab an equaliser, knowing deep down , we don't have the players, the guile the nouse to do it.

I'm not denying anyone anything. Just feel its detrimental to the players when it's done during a game.

I choose not to. You do what you choose to do but it will negatively affect the performance.

If people feel that is necessary to try and force change then that's their call, but I don't go to a game to put even more pressure on the lads in the shirt who are clearly lacking confidence to start with. I just won't kick them when they're already down.

I have no issue with folk calling for change, just feel there's a time and a place to do so and IMHO it isn't making the loudest chant during a home game with a rival one which attacks our own side.
 
Last edited:
He’s defending his choice to stick to his guns, rightly or wrongly. At least he’s not a condescending prick telling us how privileged ‘little old Hull’ should feel that he’s gracing the club with his presence purely because of the Allams money.

I agree with you on this. I generally liked Bruce but the ‘little old Hull’ comments and constantly telling us the club wouldn’t exist without the Allams, therefore we should support the name change, rubbed me the wrong way.
 
I agree with you on this. I generally liked Bruce but the ‘little old Hull’ comments and constantly telling us the club wouldn’t exist without the Allams, therefore we should support the name change, rubbed me the wrong way.

The name change put Bruce in a difficult position I felt.

Anyone who's been employed will know what happens when you publicly criticise your bosses in a professional capacity.

I don't agree with some of the policies I have to adhere to on a daily basis, but I'm not about to start expressing that in public whilst on the job. Bruce didn't want the name change, he just didn't want the distraction of it.
 
I agree with you on this. I generally liked Bruce but the ‘little old Hull’ comments and constantly telling us the club wouldn’t exist without the Allams, therefore we should support the name change, rubbed me the wrong way.

I'm not agreeing that the club wouldn't exist, but without Allams investment at that particular time, we wouldn't have been a Premier league/top end championship club and we wouldn't have had Bruce as manager.

I can see what he was getting at, but can't say I appreciated the way he said it.
 
The name change put Bruce in a difficult position I felt.

Anyone who's been employed will know what happens when you publicly criticise your bosses in a professional capacity.

I don't agree with some of the policies I have to adhere to on a daily basis, but I'm not about to start expressing that in public whilst on the job. Bruce didn't want the name change, he just didn't want the distraction of it.

Nah, there’s a difference between being tight-lipped over decisions by your boss that you don’t necessarily agree with and the persistent, condescending comments Bruce made about the Allams saving City and how much fans should be grateful to them and support the name change.
 
Nah, there’s a difference between being tight-lipped over decisions by your boss that you don’t necessarily agree with and the persistent, condescending comments Bruce made about the Allams saving City and how much fans should be grateful to them and support the name change.

Maybe. I didn't interpret his comments that way, but I can see how anyone could.
 
Maybe. I didn't interpret his comments that way, but I can see how anyone could.

Yeah, and the ‘little old Hull’ comments as if we were some country bumpkins who only recently discovered fire during the time he was manager. I mean, frigging hell, Newcastle is no Paris either, Steve.
 
The 2 wins and 3 creditable draws we've had are no more flukes than the 8 defeats are bad luck.

Luck can affect the outcome of individual games, but when you're over a quarter of the season in and in the bottom 3 then it isn't down to bad luck.
Where did I say we had been unlucky all season? **** me does any **** on here read posts before replying. I’ve had it all week!
 
Yeah, and the ‘little old Hull’ comments as if we were some country bumpkins who only recently discovered fire during the time he was manager. I mean, frigging hell, Newcastle is no Paris either, Steve.


Suspect SB was gently mocking the media at the time and how they patronised the small clubs in the PL.

No drama please.
 
Where did I say we had been unlucky all season? **** me does any **** on here read posts before replying. I’ve had it all week!

Not saying you were saying that. Just that we're not where we are down to luck.

Maybe you're making assumptions that aren't there?