Well, if this is all we have to worry about today the world is in a good place. Haway the signings and football's coming home.
You asked about 10 posts back.
thats not what BRB wroteNo I didn't.
This is what I said,
"I'm not in favour of banning members and would never ask a mod to ban a member no matter how much I might dislike what they post."
Or you could of said let’s have a vote now, I vote for banning him, or did you not say that?No I didn't.
This is what I said,
"I'm not in favour of banning members and would never ask a mod to ban a member no matter how much I might dislike what they post."
Or you could of said let’s have a vote now, I vote for banning him, or did you not say that?
thats not what BRB wrote
that's the problem right there, they are voted by the board , we should be notified that a banning warning has been issued like was always done in the past and read the thread and posts as to why this action was taken, not ban people because they had a negative comment some didn't like show me the post that got him banned and ill show you 6 posters who agreed with him who weren't bannedI said quite clearly I'd ban him.
That's not asking for a ban because he's already banned and, even if he wasn't, the vote would be irrelevant. Mods don't act on our wishes whether that's to ban or unban anyone.
I couldn't care less what he wrote.
I was told not to argue if attacked but, instead, use the report button ...
... when I did exactly that he had a paddy and a whinge on here.
that's the problem right there, they are voted by the board , we should be notified that a banning warning has been issued like was always done in the past and read the thread and posts as to why this action was taken, not ban people because they had a negative comment some didn't like show me the post that got him banned and ill show you 6 posters who agreed with him who weren't banned
Can't believe this has got to seven pages, time to call it quits imo.
I couldn't agree less, people know the rules ...
... if they come on here just to WUM, **** them.
This is just a chat forum mate, you seem to be taking it all way too seriously.
this is just a chat forum mate and everyone has the right of an opinion wether other members like it or not ,you can join in or ignore, Jesus was crucified because some people didn't like what he said, same here but on a much small scale The only one taking it seriously too far, is the mod who wanted him banned for saying something about players he took offence to, and stepped out of his Purview to punish the poster

just replying to Smugs defence of Armstrong while i wait for GA to man up and answer, why he deleted the posts and why he banned him and not the lies he published.Can't believe this has got to seven pages, time to call it quits imo.
just replying to Smugs defence of Armstrong while i wait for GA to man up and answer, why he deleted the posts and why he banned him and not the lies he published.
if GORDON HAS NOTHING TO HIDE WHY DOESN'T HE MAN UP AND TELL THE TRUTHIt's the second time this has happened.
If Roger is so concerned why doesn't he just pm Gordon to discuss the matter and bring in other Mods plus Pablo ...
... otherwise it's just a tedious dig at a Mod and a pointless thread which divides the board.
Why don't you stop butting in as you have said your what you want, allow me the courtesy of getting an answer to my questions, stop protecting him he has questions to answer and we both know he is reading thisThere wasn't one.
Nor was there anything nasty said to Wolfy that is worse than he's posted ...
... why don't you just pm the Mods, all of them?
it was GA who took this to the mods and i have already spoken to some thank you, i wait him to come out of hidingThere wasn't one.
Nor was there anything nasty said to Wolfy that is worse than he's posted ...
... why don't you just pm the Mods, all of them?
it was GA who took this to the mods and i have already spoken to some thank you, i wait him to come out of hiding