My concern is that, same over there, you aren't told just banned. Warnings fired first and if continued then bang, gone. I honestly haven't seen that on here but that doesn't mean to say it doesn't happen.
Everything in moderation !
- Thread starter Gordon Armstrong
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Its difficult though Rog, your post right there could be classed as provocation as could your whole thread on the subject
Just because its happened in the past doesn't make it right. I would like to think if people are given time to cool down, you can learn from that. If not then the bans will continue
Of course his get out clause there will be that the poster you are likely to be referring to, never got "decent" posters to retaliate
Its not really worth bickering or getting worked up about unless it happens to you
Bastards!
mate i was born in a different time , was taught right from wrong and stick up for the underdog if you think they are right, i have waded in when seeing someone mugged in Amsterdam, Slapped some guy for physically abusing his kids, fought 2 campaigns and 3 skirmishes to protect the underdog, what has happed is not right, as you can see its one rule for mates and not for others, it has to stop,Its difficult though Rog, your post right there could be classed as provocation as could your whole thread on the subject
Just because its happened in the past doesn't make it right. I would like to think if people are given time to cool down, you can learn from that. If not then the bans will continue
Of course his get out clause there will be that the poster you are likely to be referring to, never got "decent" posters to retaliate
Its not really worth bickering or getting worked up about unless it happens to you
Wolfy was clearly a **** on a wind up. Play with feather dusters and you get your arse tickled.
No ****ing idea who Pedro is, not come across him.
Feel for anyone who tries to mod. I despised it. Good luck.
No ****ing idea who Pedro is, not come across him.
Feel for anyone who tries to mod. I despised it. Good luck.
Maybe because it’s pablo lol
yet posters still agreed with his points of view some didn't, remember Bruce in Bruce out lasted ages , my point is Wolfy was banned without a warning just told your banned he came back as pablo which i wasn't aware of till a few days ago however he kept his nose clean and was still banned and all his post on the thread deleted, a few things he said came true, and people are still talking now about points he raised like Burge isn't good enough, the young guys should have been given a chance, even his point about Maguire LJ brought him back in, and McGeady being brought back and playing Sanderson when loads were against it at the time, it cause talking points but he was never abusive even when attacked verbally
Last edited:
Firstly, Marcus and I discuss certain posters who deliberately disrupt our board, which is mostly friendly and very welcoming, and act accordingly to protect the good atmosphere that generally prevails. We have removed abusive posters, usually idiotic skunks who only have one purpose . . . . to disrupt and be offensive to us in our little community.
Secondly, Wolfy was banned because of his constant provocation, deliberately goading other, decent, posters into abusive retaliation . . . . which is not good for the overall atmosphere, and only encourages decent posters to refrain from contribution. Some have mentioned that at times it's 'just like over the road so what's the point' !
Our job is to prevent the hostility that seems to be 'the norm' on RTG because it scares people away and we don't want this (our) forum to become like the wild west as is sometimes the case in other places.
Thirdly, Pablo is not banned as far as I'm aware, because he hasn't been as disruptive as he was as Wolfy, but anyone who deliberately sets out to disrupt a thread will be prevented from posting on that thread as a first measure, which will hopefully make him think before it goes too far.
Finally, deliberately trying to divide the board by turning others against a particular poster, who in this instance is trying to maintain peace and a good atmosphere, like has happened yesterday with me being the target, doesn't help as far as I'm concerned.
Let's try to keep this forum what it is . . . . a really good place to visit, eh
Well said
Basically this. Sure if the guy is that bothered he can create a new account and behave himself. Problem solved.
how can you say that, when ive have just checked your postings, and see you have never been on a thread where Wolfy or Pablo has contributed. in fact you have 10 posts total and all before april, how can you judge why were posts deleted, why were no warning given, why let other posters off the hook instead of having a level playing field
Last edited:
It seems there's only a handful of people who had any time for him, I could be wrong but that's the way it looks.
he did and was banned and posts deleted then reinstated when the complaints came in am i wrong to ask why
So what mate he was a contributor Monty is the same but has never been banned, you have had more arguments than he has in fact he never did have one, probably why he got picked on he never fought back, its not right what has happend, and this business of deleting post must stop as well, its a cowards way to hide the truth
Is he Pedro's brother?
Mods have put their views on this thread now. They said he’s not banned, just removed from a certain thread, so it sounds like he’s got a second chance.
I’m more interested in worrying about our lack of transfers
At the end of the day, it's all oddbods fault, the illiterate perma sending spunk gargling fcuk trumpet and coward.
Somebodys pinched my sombrero
Well-Known Member
I reckon Comfy’s behind all this. Well known trouble causer.
So what should we do? Just leave a guy we have constant complaints about to possibly drive posters away? Or ban the problem, see if they can get their act together and see what happens afterwards? There have been no issues since he was banned for Gordon and I to talk about. He’s back under a new guise and seems to be going well so far. May not agree with what he says but he’s doing it the right way. Long may it continue
im more interested why his posts were removed and why reinstated and no explanation, i was on that thread and his posts disappeared, he said nothing untoward and i could prove it but the posts have been deleted why not reinstate them for us to judge , or scared it will show vindictivenessMods have put their views on this thread now. They said he’s not banned, just removed from a certain thread, so it sounds like he’s got a second chance.
I’m more interested in worrying about our lack of transfers
- Status