But it was an error. Clear and obvious because it wasn’t four play but a scoring opportunity and it wasn’t.
Match Day Thread Saints 9 v Leicester 0, 8pm Friday 30th April, Sky Sports
- Thread starter thereisonlyoneno7
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Just seen it, ****ing hell
Bullshit ......isn’t it?
But we can't criticise her opinion cos she's a woman.'Nasty tackle'
Southampton 0-0 Leicester
Karen Carney
Former Arsenal winger on BBC Radio 5 Live
"It is a sloppy touch from Vestegaard. Jamie Vardy is always going to pounce. Vestergaard is late and rash. It was nasty. He got a nick on the ball but it was a nasty tackle onto Vardy's ankle. He has been sent off and rightly so."
Can’t make the incompetent idiot with the whistle look like he might have made a mistake.
Not a clear enough one to get overturned. Because he dived in a reckless manner it was a foul and there's not enough evidence to overturn the DOGSO part of it. So VAR stayed with the referee's decision.
You’re just defending it because he’s a referee. You said yourself it wasn’t a red but now you’ve reverted to type.
four play? Have you found a different programme? I didn't think those started until after midnight. er, apparently, so I've been told...
Watching it back, Vestergaard actively and clearly changes the angle of his foot to direct the ball back to McCarthy. No way at all it is a deliberate or reckless attempt to play Vardy's ankles too.
Seeing as Balbuena got sent of for contact on the follow through in an area with no danger whatsoever, it perhaps shouldn't be surprising but it's farcical nonetheless
Seeing as Balbuena got sent of for contact on the follow through in an area with no danger whatsoever, it perhaps shouldn't be surprising but it's farcical nonetheless
This is what the forum is for, to be fair.
At least we never tire in the second half
Well l think we have done pretty well since the incident. l thought one note of positivity should be mentioned.
I only turned on after I heard of the red card and think we've done okay in that time tbh.
Balbeunas got rescinded. So if that was overturned, there’s no way this should be a red.
libby is right, we’re going well since the red. We were doing well before, too. Just don’t understand why the referees have to be the centre of attention every single game.
I'm not saying it was a great decision. But my point VAR can't overturn it because it's not a glaring error. This is where we need to hear the conversation that goes on. If he hadn't given a foul VAR wouldn't have gone back to it. It's unfortunate but we haven't been exactly massively screwed over either.