But it was an error. Clear and obvious because it wasn’t four play but a scoring opportunity and it wasn’t.
Not a clear enough one to get overturned. Because he dived in a reckless manner it was a foul and there's not enough evidence to overturn the DOGSO part of it. So VAR stayed with the referee's decision.
Can we please stop this silly bitching over a decision that has been made and move on? FFS this is tedious...
You’re just defending it because he’s a referee. You said yourself it wasn’t a red but now you’ve reverted to type.
four play? Have you found a different programme? I didn't think those started until after midnight. er, apparently, so I've been told...
Watching it back, Vestergaard actively and clearly changes the angle of his foot to direct the ball back to McCarthy. No way at all it is a deliberate or reckless attempt to play Vardy's ankles too. Seeing as Balbuena got sent of for contact on the follow through in an area with no danger whatsoever, it perhaps shouldn't be surprising but it's farcical nonetheless
Well l think we have done pretty well since the incident. l thought one note of positivity should be mentioned.
Balbeunas got rescinded. So if that was overturned, there’s no way this should be a red. libby is right, we’re going well since the red. We were doing well before, too. Just don’t understand why the referees have to be the centre of attention every single game.
I'm not saying it was a great decision. But my point VAR can't overturn it because it's not a glaring error. This is where we need to hear the conversation that goes on. If he hadn't given a foul VAR wouldn't have gone back to it. It's unfortunate but we haven't been exactly massively screwed over either.