Now I'm expected to believe scousers are squeaky cleanNo, liverpool spent that much on wages. City spent that and various bung and image rights schemes on wages.

Now I'm expected to believe scousers are squeaky cleanNo, liverpool spent that much on wages. City spent that and various bung and image rights schemes on wages.

Is that the one that has them at 85%? It's a year out of date and the results are posted a year late, so it's basically two years back.
It's got Huddersfield and Cardiff in it, who went down at the end of the 18/19 season.
Everton's percentage has actually gone up, but several clubs have leapfrogged them.
The current season's going to be far worse for everyone, of course, but we won't see that for a year.
What graph, not sure what you are on with. But if it makes you feel better, err, liverpool win net spend trophy this year.
But have it taken away for loaning Chip Spice in, because he is gash
I didn't see a chart posted by Tobes, so I can't comment on it.The original chart posted by Tobes is 2018? If you have more updated figures I'd love to see them
The one tobes posted to try and prove a point. And I prefer whatever we didn't win this season to your cuckoo clock.
You done 50m on the Brazilian Benteke.Hold on, Liverpool spend £54m on Naby Anderton, lets get this into context
You and Tobes are definitely gunna beat the **** out of each other over this. Tobes got the big buttons so you're effectively fighting with one hand behind your back. Good luck![]()

Not one like?You done 50m on the Brazilian Benteke.
for context.
You done 50m on the Brazilian Benteke.
for context.
Lets talk iwobiHow much, his skinning of Chip Spice was worth it
I could.
Wages in £ and then wages as a percentage of revenue:
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Everton are further down than you thought. Some ****ing dangerously high numbers for a few clubs in there.
Lets talk iwobi
Since you ignored that bangin joke in my last post
why mention the table that is driving you bonkers to me then.
take a minute, have a brew and chill. Euro Conference is calling Gergen.

Now I'm expected to believe scousers are squeaky clean![]()

Lets talk iwobi
Since you ignored that bangin joke in my last post
Well, er, it's been the general theme of the last two pages. But I don't blame you for not wanting to talk about it - you don't come out of it too well, truth be told.![]()
Yada, Yada...context is everything.Much as I agree with the comment re our owners, I'd suggest people actually read that rather than the headline quote, given in almost Daily Gammon style (you haven't got a gurning picture of Klopp to go with it as well, have you?).
1) Liverpool's NETT spend is £328m, half that of 3rd place United, less again by a further £40m from Chelsea, and one third of that of City.
2) Per season nett spend is only £2m more than Everton.
3) The nett spend per season is half that of United's and Chelsea's, and one third of City's.
4) So if we consider Liverpool more in a group of themselves, Arsenal, Villa and Everton, as opposed to being in the top group of United, City and Chelsea, have Liverpool and Arsenal over-achieved in their trophy tally in this period, or have Everton and Villa proportionally spunked the most money just to say they were there?![]()
well you would have to be a tad rich to do £1bn .Yada, Yada...context is everything.
I was replying to a post decrying the ‘vulgarity’ of Chelsea’s spending and just put it into context.
Kopites crying about clubs like Chelsea gate crashing their party whilst they’ve done £1BN themselves is a tad rich.