Come on mate!
I know there's fully signed up to the cult of Ralph posters on here but on any measure how is Ralph better than Ron?
Ralph has had us flirting with relegation each season he's been in charge. He's managed to get equal the record for the worst ever Premier league defeat twice!! A record which had stood and hadn't been equaled since 1995. Ralph has managed that home and away. He's overseen the worst run of results in our history. We couldn't beat a team who were down to 9 ****ing men! Our game is one dimensional and predictable, and dare I say it, ****ing boring. Sideways pass, sideways pass, backwards, giving the opposition ample opportunity to get back and defend, counter attack against us and score. He can't organise a defence and sure as **** can't coach them. I no longer feel confident about going into a game under his leadership. Every record he has set with Saints has been negative.
(He did however win us the top in October for 23 hrs trophy.)
Compare with Ron
Winning games scoring 5, 6, 8 goals in the process. Placing high enough in the league that we were playing European football. Walking into St Mary's and no matter what the opposition thinking we could beat them. Playing some genuinely exciting dynamic football.
Ralph is worse than Puel, marginally better than Pellegrino. He's basically Hughes with a personality
Crying when we beat Liverpool was genius. It has fans desperately clawing at ways to defend him because they believe he cares. Football is a results business, and all the excuses in the world doesn’t change the fact that he's not getting them. Any other team would have sacked him, everyone here seems to think that's because the club/Players believe in him. We can't afford to sack and replace him