Gordon Armstrong

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gordon Armstrong said:
Yes it was, which has led to a ban for Smug to calm things down, so your aim has been achieved, and THAT says it all . . . . well done :emoticon-0148-yes:
Click to expand...
so why did he have a go at me again when it had all died down from his last outburst the guy has some serious issues

i never asked for him to be banned but i read he had been warned he was being watched for his behaviour
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfy
Makemstine Roger said:
mate i have been here a long time and know how many have left the board because of smug, how many were banned by Gordon on his take over threaded or left and i was never involved , i stick up for myself smug picks on me that's why the thread descended to **** because PREHAB told him he was being harsh RTB ask why and i pasted Smugs own words he went off it like a petulant child.
Click to expand...

I know you and Smug don't see eye to eye, or is it i to i. Anyways, I can see with my own eyes, or i's, who is being a disruptive bellend and it isn't Smug. It's Wolfy and KLD. They have got previous with Smug and have brought it over here like a pair of childish **** nuggets and both are lying ****s about it. Imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots, Nathan Brazil and Skanter
Sandy Camel said:
I know you and Smug don't see eye to eye, or is it i to i. Anyways, I can see with my own eyes, or i's, who is being a disruptive bellend and it isn't Smug. It's Wolfy and KLD. They have got previous with Smug and have brought it over here like a pair of childish **** nuggets and both are lying ****s about it. Imo.
Click to expand...
yet it wasn't them that started the arguments over 3 threads it was SMUG having a go at me for replying to RTB using his own words, you were on the thread Sandy it wasn't them it was smug and i will not take **** off smug for that he can complain as much as he wants and did, he always twists it around to accuse others of what he has done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfy
Sandy Camel said:
I know you and Smug don't see eye to eye, or is it i to i. Anyways, I can see with my own eyes, or i's, who is being a disruptive bellend and it isn't Smug. It's Wolfy and KLD. They have got previous with Smug and have brought it over here like a pair of childish **** nuggets and both are lying ****s about it. Imo.
Click to expand...
So you think it’s only those two he has issues with I would take your head out your arse and read his replies a bit closer it’s anybody who doesn’t agree with him gets called worse than s hit in my case a child molester sympathiser and a rapist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wolfy, Porterfield73, SpikeyBob and 1 other person
Makemstine Roger said:
so why did he have a go at me again when it had all died down from his last outburst the guy has some serious issues

i never asked for him to be banned but i read he had been warned he was being watched for his behaviour
Click to expand...
How the feck should I know ?
Perhaps we should all 'move on' now 'cos it's doing nobody any good, except those who just want to have a good laugh and/or make things worse !
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrRAWhite and rooch 3
Ozzymac said:
Great post LBW.

Moderation of a forum is basically deleting/editing posts when they cross a certain line and then warning/taking action against the poster. Not preemptive censorship.
Click to expand...

Depends. If the posters are being deliberately ****ty towards one particular poster, and in the case of Wolfy and KLD it's obvious they have a Smug obsession, it's fair that they're pre-emptively shot down. If they can't behave themselves the only other option you have is to let the thread descend into a mess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Makemstine Roger said:
mate i have been here a long time and know how many have left the board because of smug, how many were banned by Gordon on his take over threaded or left and i was never involved , i stick up for myself smug picks on me that's why the thread descended to **** because PREHAB told him he was being harsh RTB ask why and i pasted Smugs own words he went off it like a petulant child.
Click to expand...

I was on the takeover thread myself marra, saw a few get banned and it wasn't because they were getting picked on by a bullying cult, it was because they were acting the twat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Sandy Camel said:
Depends. If the posters are being deliberately ****ty towards one particular poster, and in the case of Wolfy and KLD it's obvious they have a Smug obsession, it's fair that they're pre-emptively shot down. If they can't behave themselves the only other option you have is to let the thread descend into a mess.
Click to expand...
as far as i remember i don't see any nasty replies to smug by them, but there were plenty from smug addressed to them, if there are could you please point me to them
 
Makemstine Roger said:
as far as i remember i don't see any nasty replies to smug by them, but there were plenty from smug addressed to them, if there are could you please point me to them
Click to expand...

Couldn't care less what you remember l and I don't need to point anything out to you.
 
Sandy Camel said:
I was on the takeover thread myself marra, saw a few get banned and it wasn't because they were getting picked on by a bullying cult, it was because they were acting the twat.
Click to expand...
i never popped on there much but when i did i saw a couple of poster being picked on because they dared to say that smugs ITK about the americans was wrong and smug blew a gasket again yet turn out they were right smug found out about KLD around the time we all did but i kept out of it.
 
Sandy Camel said:
Wolfy and KLD deserve an apology? How about them apologising to the entire board for bringing their petty hatred of Smug over here while lying that they've never had an account before? Do you think that would be fair?
Click to expand...
Sorry Sandy that's your perception show me a thread where there is any abuse from them the slander was all going one way to them which is why i tried to stop it Gordons job to keep the peace
 
This thread is embarrassing. Getting more like RTG every day - some of us came over here to avoid all the bollocks.

Same names over and over being twats........
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skanter
rooch 3 said:
So you think it’s only those two he has issues with I would take your head out your arse and read his replies a bit closer it’s anybody who doesn’t agree with him gets called worse than s hit in my case a child molester sympathiser and a rapist.
Click to expand...

I'm not really taking a defence of Smug position marra, more a Wolfy and KLD are lying ****s who have had previous accounts and bring a petty obsession about Smug to the board type of position. And my head isn't up my arse thanks, I haven't insulted you so need for that towards me..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nathan Brazil, Skanter and rooch 3
Sandy Camel said:
Depends. If the posters are being deliberately ****ty towards one particular poster, and in the case of Wolfy and KLD it's obvious they have a Smug obsession, it's fair that they're pre-emptively shot down. If they can't behave themselves the only other option you have is to let the thread descend into a mess.
Click to expand...
Genuine question Sandy...

Were they being deliberately ****ty to Smug or did they just have a different opinion?

Don't get me wrong, i think they're negative twats as well. However, surely they are entitled to voice their opinions as well?

As to the pre-emptively shot down aspect i don't agree. By all means if the poster crosses the line too many times then ban them from the forum but to prevent someone form posting "just in case" is wrong in my humble opinion. ****, if life was simply about "just in case" then my wife would never let me leave the house
 
  • Like
Reactions: rooch 3 and Makemstine Roger
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back