no rice or Antonio for this one
I think we might win this game for some strange reason
2-1
I think we might win this game for some strange reason
2-1
Unfortunately vs West Ham
- Thread starter Fox Mulder
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
West ham will faulter at some point and I think it might be next week
Maybe if Wilson and Max are fit like. Lascelles and Hayden being injured is a bonus
We are capable of winning.
However I think Lingard tears us a new one. Rice and Antonio are big misses for them though. Too much of a team for us I suspect.
Shame because we should be looking at Burnley and West Ham as two full throttle fixtures. Win them both and Fulham would be broken.
However I think Lingard tears us a new one. Rice and Antonio are big misses for them though. Too much of a team for us I suspect.
Shame because we should be looking at Burnley and West Ham as two full throttle fixtures. Win them both and Fulham would be broken.
Yeah I think Haydens injury was a blessing.. He's really just a very basic player isn't he.
I love how Bruce's been chopping and changing all season, but then after last week he comes out saying "I'm sure it raised a few eyebrows" as if he knew exactly what he was doing. There's no way he'd have dropped Hayden if he wasn't injured yet he said he thought it was the right time for Sean GTFO
He'll use this until it shows the 1zr sign of faultering and then he'll scrumple it up and try something else.
This is the thing and something Bruce has been right about and it's losing 3 or 4 of your best players causes any side big problems.
He was imo justified using that excuse, but of course once your hated it falls on deaf ears
Bruce no longer has that excuse
West ham won't be as good without those 2 and in hopeful they'll get one or 2 more this week.
Fingers crossed
Nah Bruce will have come away thinking that worked today and use the same thing regardless of the opposition.
I mean I suppose it might work better vs West ham I don't really know much about them tbh I haven't watched them much at all.?
Can we please just get rid of shelvey? He's absolutely useless.
The game slows down everytime he gets on the ball.. The other players have to hold back.
He's ****
The game slows down everytime he gets on the ball.. The other players have to hold back.
He's ****
No clause Bruce's basically making sure he doesn't want to stay, so he can get hendrick back in the side or sign Tom Davies instead I suspect.
I keep hoping shelvey gets injured, but he doesn't even try hard enough to get injured.. He's allowed to play a lazy carefree way
We better not play ****ing 5 at the back again.
Idealistic line up
-------------------Wilson-------------
ASM-------------Almiron-----------Murphy
-----------Longstaff-----Shelvey----------
Dummett--Clarke-Fernandez--Manquillo
-------------------Dubravka-------------
Realistic, tad hopeful -
-----------**Wilson--------ASM---------
------------------Almiron-----------
--------Longstaff------Shelvey----------
Ritchie----------------------------------Murphy
---------Dummett-Clarke-Fernandez-----
--------------------Dubravka-------------
**Probably Joelinton instead like
Idealistic line up
-------------------Wilson-------------
ASM-------------Almiron-----------Murphy
-----------Longstaff-----Shelvey----------
Dummett--Clarke-Fernandez--Manquillo
-------------------Dubravka-------------
Realistic, tad hopeful -
-----------**Wilson--------ASM---------
------------------Almiron-----------
--------Longstaff------Shelvey----------
Ritchie----------------------------------Murphy
---------Dummett-Clarke-Fernandez-----
--------------------Dubravka-------------
**Probably Joelinton instead like