I have to disagree mate. I thought the bit about the play off spot going west was the biggest bit of nonsense
FFS man, one defeat and these people are ganging up to slap each others backs.
Is Jack Ross back
- Thread starter 123Daveyboy
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
FFS man, one defeat and these people are ganging up to slap each others backs.
We are going for goals mate, the number of shots we had proves that. Unfortunately, our star striker is misfiring all of a sudden and we've got no one else who is potent enough in front of goal.
did i claim anything your thoughts not mine, i published a fact your decision how you perceive it.No because that would be ridiculous.
Surely you're not claiming all these people are cowering behind their screens and too frightened to post ...
... but all disagree with me
Jones, McGeady, etc have let Wyke down tbh.
It's pointless playing the ball to his feet, he doesn't know what to do with the ball.
Get quick crosses in or shoot yourself, don't try to play triangles around their box.
correct mate hence people suggesting a change, at the end of the day what anyone says on here is not going to change LJ mind, but its good having the chat about the options open mate, that's why i enjoy Nads and Clockys input they have a lot more football suggestions than me, i can only tell it how my heart feels
That's your inevitable response when you can't back up what you've said ...
... always the same.
But only if you agree with them ...
... otherwise you inevitably have a go at people.
We've just gone 14 matches unbeaten before yesterday. That doesn't happen when you're playing **** imo so disagree with that.
I agree with all of that, but Chas is missing chances he would have put away a few weeks ago. It's a question of whether LJ wants to stick or twist - does he take Wyke out of the firing line or let him play himself back into form?
My concern is if we drop him, we've got no one else who is proven to score a lot of goals, and we need goals.
your perceptions again not mine i have had a few differences of opinion lately,Mick serbs and Nacho will testify to that, gentlemen each putting forward their own points of view which disagree with mine,it only breaks down when people start insults off
FFS THERE YOU GO AGAIN you normally have an argument with posters or slag them off 1 a week, and always making accusations yet when replied to you can't just move on, please put me on ignore so i can get the thread back on track without you disrupting it.
This is always your routine Roger, every time.
You complain about people for doing exactly what you always do,
I always thought it was just a ploy but I now think you're actually just thick.
You, and these other knackers, disrupt thread after thread then plead the innocent, what a bunch of sad losers.
very good point however the other side of the coin is if we keep playing him i have visions of Graham and Grigg popping in my mind, he was **** for 2 seasons before his purple patch with Mc Geadys assists 4 in one game i believe, if he is not firing we play with 10 men we can score from midfield or try the other striker combinations available.
RTB asked a question i replied to him with the answer, you did not like the answer, but it was your words. Prehab said you were too harsh, and here you go again proving it, your problem is you cant be shown to be wrong even when it was your own words
you have to break down to insults, as you have run out of things to defend yourself please put me on ignore you can't take the truth
Yeah, i understand what you're saying, but I'd be more concerned if he wasn't getting into goalscoring positions or going through the motions. The latter is something we can definitely level at Grigg and Graham.
