Match Day Thread Hull City v Lincoln

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Hull City win?

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
Plum said:
£10 a go it's a decent wedge. Anyone know how it's divvied up?
Click to expand...

This article explains some of it. Of course the costs are taken out before the money is divided up. As it explains the costs of the broadcast are taken out first. It is possible for City to make more than the home team if we sold enough for an away game. I should imagine Sunderland are raking in more for their away games than the home teams for one. Of course we have a lot on Dare To Dream only watching if someone does a free stream and depriving the club of income.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...-ifollow-streaming-revenue-explained-18975658
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ric Glasgow
pierredelafranchesca said:
Our best chances last night came when we lost the ball high up, counter pressed and won it back, it frustrates the fkin hell out of me that we aren't more aggressive, esp at home, when it comes to pressing. We've got the energy with our midfield and enough pace at the back to handle long balls, I want us to press high, put other teams under pressure, if they're good enough to pass it round us then fair play to them, but in L1 from what i've seen, not many are.
Click to expand...

Fair point, but Lincoln are one of the best sides on L1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ric Glasgow
Barchullona said:
This article explains some of it. Of course the costs are taken out before the money is divided up. As it explains the costs of the broadcast are taken out first. It is possible for City to make more than the home team if we sold enough for an away game. I should imagine Sunderland are raking in more for their away games than the home teams for one. Of course we have a lot on Dare To Dream only watching if someone does a free stream and depriving the club of income.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.c...-ifollow-streaming-revenue-explained-18975658
Click to expand...

There aren't really many watching on Dare to Dream, it states how many are watching in the top corner and it's generally been about 200 whenever I've looked.
 
The Dare to Dream feed is generally someone holding a phone in front of a telly, it's not something you'd go for if you actually wanted to watch the game. I suspect the people watching are those that simply wouldn't watch it at all if it wasn't free and people who are away from a computer and just want a glance at what's going on (which is when I've looked at it). No doubt it's taking some cash away from the club, but it's probably not a great deal.
 
originallambrettaman said:
The Dare to Dream feed is generally someone holding a phone in front of a telly, it's not something you'd go for if you actually wanted to watch the game. I suspect the people watching are those that simply wouldn't watch it at all if it wasn't free and people who are away from a computer and just want a glance at what's going on (which is when I've looked at it). No doubt it's taking some cash away from the club, but it's probably not a great deal.
Click to expand...
The big problem he has is that he has asked for money and sponsorship. It isn't the club that would go after him, its the EFL.
 
originallambrettaman said:
The Dare to Dream feed is generally someone holding a phone in front of a telly, it's not something you'd go for if you actually wanted to watch the game. I suspect the people watching are those that simply wouldn't watch it at all if it wasn't free and people who are away from a computer and just want a glance at what's going on (which is when I've looked at it). No doubt it's taking some cash away from the club, but it's probably not a great deal.
Click to expand...
Lot of probably's there. The name of the site needs changing then, don't you think ? Perhaps to' Dare to Dream as long as it doesn't us cost anything'
Read some of the posts on there. Lots of pent up abuse for a club they only have a passing interest in ? Don't think so.
If someone was stealing from your company in such a casual way and advertising the fact, then publicly slagging you of because the item they stole off you wasn't what they expected, I don't think you'd see it as a minor irritation.
 
Urika Peece. said:
Lot of probably's there. The name of the site needs changing then, don't you think ? Perhaps to' Dare to Dream as long as it doesn't us cost anything'
Read some of the posts on there. Lots of pent up abuse for a club they only have a passing interest in ? Don't think so.
If someone was stealing from your company in such a casual way and advertising the fact, then publicly slagging you of because the item they stole off you wasn't what they expected, I don't think you'd see it as a minor irritation.
Click to expand...

I wasn't condoning or excusing what they're doing, just saying I doubt it's actually costing the club much. The page is full of raving lunatics, as are most of the City Facebook pages.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back