Oh no doubt. The only one you really ****ed up with was Kante, yes i know you have an adequate replacement but he was worth much more and has been wasted for much of his time at Chelsea.Still some incredible business on our part tbf ...
Oh no doubt. The only one you really ****ed up with was Kante, yes i know you have an adequate replacement but he was worth much more and has been wasted for much of his time at Chelsea.Still some incredible business on our part tbf ...
Oh no doubt. The only one you really ****ed up with was Kante, yes i know you have an adequate replacement but he was worth much more and has been wasted for much of his time at Chelsea.

His teams did, still a waste of his talents though by Chelsae.We learned from that ... no release clauses in contracts since ... not sure about that waste mind ... he's won a second Premier League title, an FA Cup, a Europa League and a World Cup whilst at Chelsea ... but other than those, you are spot on![]()
He’s getting paid by Arsenal whilst playing in turkey
as if the contract would be terminated...he isn’t refusing to play, he’s just been excluded so why would he agree to terminate it?
from what I hear he’s getting paid sumt like 70k a week for the next 4 years coz the Goonz can’t afford the lump sum. They just taken out a 20 mill loan
Genuine question...do you think that giving Aubamayang such a huge contract at 31 will cause a similar problem?
Obviously I hope not
As for Ozil I think they must have paid him something so they could do a confidentiality clause in or there'd be an enormous PR dogfight played out very publicly.
Nah, aubameyang is a baller. He’s having a bit of a drought atm but all strikers go through patches like that.
Not sure we’ll ever get the full details of Ozil severance package, but all reports are saying his contract has been mutually terminated and he’s given up the £7m in earnings he would have got had he stayed.
Heard that he is being granted a perpetual membership at The Emirates ... even if he hasn't returned all the books he had previously taken out![]()

In other words, Ozil paid £7m to get out of Arsenal.Nah, aubameyang is a baller. He’s having a bit of a drought atm but all strikers go through patches like that.
Not sure we’ll ever get the full details of Ozil severance package, but all reports are saying his contract has been mutually terminated and he’s given up the £7m in earnings he would have got had he stayed.
In other words, Ozil paid £7m to get out of Arsenal.
Lol
Pinkie really putting the most positive spin on it
what I said is the truth tho
Goonz paying him off in 4 years instead of 2...that was as goodwill as Ozil was prepared to get.
no way has he taken a 7 mill hit
Lol
Pinkie really putting the most positive spin on it
what I said is the truth tho
Goonz paying him off in 4 years instead of 2...that was as goodwill as Ozil was prepared to get.
no way has he taken a 7 mill hit
These transfers are ****ing confusing... was reading about us taking out bank loans, which I thought was strange given our transfer profits ... but it's to do with timing ... City for Mahrez, United for Maguire and Chelsea for Chilwell aren't paying up front ... it's so much a year over 5 years or so ... so you take out a bank loan for a large proportion of that 'income' and then the sums subsequently received go straight to the banks to pay off the loans ... who'd of thought that City, United and the Chavs ain't actually got the readies?
Practically everybody on the planet reported that we paid £80m up front at the time of the transfer so where’s this info coming from?
@Libby @Saints for the WinTottenham are lining up a summer move for Southampton and England forward Danny Ings, 28. (Eurosport)