FFSI'm not saying it's 100% accurate.

FFSI'm not saying it's 100% accurate.

You'd have to get Rupert Murdoch to draw them for you.
And they're of roughly this standard:I draw them myself, for people like you.
Only that’s not what I asked, I even spelled it out. I get you don’t want Governmental control, I get that Communism isn’t what you want either, you profess to want anarchism. So my question was simply what does it look like in its most basic form? That was it.

And they're of roughly this standard:
You must log in or register to see images
If only I knew one ****ing thing about anything.

Wrong again.... Its not possible to peel no edges from a important subject.
Sorry but I ain't got the time for a three hour lecture on why I don't want a government to govern over me.
I agree with chomsky and yes he does if you read his books but that's not my issue I've already delved into his mind and please why would I put it in my words when his are so much better.
Are we not allowed to agree with others these days.....seems a strange idea that you got through life without agreeing with others and using their great ideas as inspiration.
"Facebook, Twitter and Google have massive power. They have a monopoly on public discourse in the online arena."Watch ****erberg and Arsey squirm...
You must log in or register to see media
I draw them myself, for people like you.
"Facebook, Twitter and Google have massive power. They have a monopoly on public discourse in the online arena."
3 companies have a monopoly? He might want to go and look that word up.
They're massively biased towards conservatives and yet they still cry about it.
If Trump was a normal user, then he'd have been banned years ago. He breaks their terms of service every day.
He pretends to be an anarchist whilst being a conformist. I remember him ranting about masks on the CV thread, how, he wouldn’t wear one etc. Until he let it slip he’d been wearing one all day at work, as he’d patently been told to, by his bossSo you want to live in a system set out by another. Not your own?
He’s got a normal job and family etc but smokes copious amounts of home grown, watches some YouTube vids and thinks he’s a ****ing anarchist. Yet he can’t even explain what an anarchist society actually is. He pretends to be an anarchist whilst being a conformist. I remember him ranting about masks on the CV thread, how, he wouldn’t wear one etc. Until he let it slip he’d been wearing one all day at work, as he’d patently been told to, by his bossHe’s got a normal job and family etc but smokes copious amounts of home grown, watches some YouTube vids and thinks he’s a ****ing anarchist. Yet he can’t even explain what an anarchist society actually is.
Another rebellious kid who’s never grown up.
You do realise that social media platforms can do whatever the **** they like with content posted on their walls don’t you?The evidence that has been asked for is data showing the number of Republicans banned/silenced vs number of Democrats banned/silenced, and you will have seen all three snivelling ****ers dodge giving any kind of commitment to providing that data, despite paying lip service to wanting to be transparent.
Why would they want to hide that evidence unless it was highly incriminating?
Whether or not Trump is re-elected, ****erberg and the rest had better start packing their toothbrushes.
The evidence that has been asked for is data showing the number of Republicans banned/silenced vs number of Democrats banned/silenced, and you will have seen all three snivelling ****ers dodge giving any kind of commitment to providing that data, despite paying lip service to wanting to be transparent.
Why would they want to hide that evidence unless it was highly incriminating?
Whether or not Trump is re-elected, ****erberg and the rest had better start packing their toothbrushes.
You do realise that social media platforms can do whatever the **** they like with content posted on their walls don’t you?
You do realise that social media platforms can do whatever the **** they like with content posted on their walls don’t you?
Numbers don't mean ****.The evidence that has been asked for is data showing the number of Republicans banned/silenced vs number of Democrats banned/silenced, and you will have seen all three snivelling ****ers dodge giving any kind of commitment to providing that data, despite paying lip service to wanting to be transparent.
Why would they want to hide that evidence unless it was highly incriminating?
Whether or not Trump is re-elected, ****erberg and the rest had better start packing their toothbrushes.