US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..

  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tbf Diego, I've read the article again and seen the original investigation relates to the mid-term congressional elections and took 3 months for the investigation and verdict. I don't want to mislead after researching the facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Diego said:
Fair enough, you said North Carolina Investigators, same question though, how do they know?

Remember votes are anonymous (supposedly) so how do they know if anyone has advised where to put the cross or who posted the envelope?
Click to expand...

I can't answer that. All I'm going by is that it was spotted, investigated and successfully prosecuted. This all happened after the votes were counted though.

It suggests the most likely way it was brought to the attention of the authorities involved people coming forward. And that's the risk of trying to coerce people to vote in a particular way on a mass-scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Treble said:
Tbf Diego, I've read the article again and seen the original investigation relates to the mid-term congressional elections and took 3 months for the investigation and verdict. I don't want to mislead after researching the facts.
Click to expand...
An interesting concept investigating something like this though, where do you start?
Knocking door to door and asking if anyone gave the household advice on where to put their cross or offered to post the envelope for them, **** lot of time and legwork involved in that and i would imagine a lot of pissed off people being asked.
 
Treble said:
I can't answer that. All I'm going by is that it was spotted, investigated and successfully prosecuted. This all happened after the votes were counted though.

It suggests the most likely way it was brought to the attention of the authorities involved people coming forward. And that's the risk of trying to coerce people to vote in a particular way on a mass-scale.
Click to expand...
Coercion is a definite nono and not what i was talking about, then i can understand it coming out when people weren't happy about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
Diego said:
Coercion is a definite nono and not what i was talking about, then i can understand it coming out when people weren't happy about it.
Click to expand...

In the North Carolina case it must've involved people coming forward about the way one of the operatives (Dowless) went about trying to illegally collect and sometimes fill in absentee ballots.

I think something like that will always come out if you're trying to do it on a mass scale. Imagine it, millions of voters would requires hundreds, if not thousands of operatives involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
You can almost see the rage.

You must log in or register to see images
 
This is a good summary of the extent of the fraud that the courts will have to look at:-

You must log in or register to see media
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back