US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..

  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hoddle is a god said:
There is evidence of vote rigging in the USA election.

There is a lack of scientific evidence to support the efficacy of locking down healthy people to fight this virus (or any virus in history).

There is clearly enough of a link between these two to make the subject worthy of sensible debate, rather than your continual juvenile sniping and character assassination.

Why do you have to act so defensively? Is it to cover up your lack of education and intelligence?
Click to expand...
1. There simply isn’t.

2. There is no current lockdown across the States

3. Maybe in your head, but you’ve been obvs gaslit beyond belief.

4. Read your 3rd paragraph, and allow the hypocrisy there to permeate your rather odd cranium.

Have a nice day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole, CFC: Champs £launderx17 and Peej
Hoddle is a god said:
Who gives a **** what that lying talkinghead has to say about anything (on MSM)?

The evidence for fraud is there, and it will be examined by the courts.

No amount of outrage by this talkinghead is going to alter that fact.

People should calm down, shut up, and wait for the court cases to be heard.
Click to expand...

At what point do you stop, and ask yourself - "am I just thinking of anything I can, no matter how unfeasible, to argue and argue a point which is likely misjudged and tbf, highly unrealistic?"

Do you ever pause to do that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
So the election will be decided in the courts, not at the polls.


However, Mr Trump's efforts to overturn the result suffered three setbacks on Friday:

  • In Arizona, his team dropped a lawsuit seeking a review of ballots cast on Election Day after it became clear his rival's lead was unassailable. The challenge was based on a claim that some legal votes had been rejected
  • In Michigan, a judge rejected a request by two Republican poll watchers - who had alleged fraud in Wayne County - to block the certification of election results in Detroit
  • In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Trump campaign's requests to invalidate several batches of mail-in ballots were rejected
 
Treble said:
At what point do you stop, and ask yourself - "am I just thinking of anything I can, no matter how unfeasible, to argue and argue a point which is likely misjudged and tbf, highly unrealistic?"

Do you ever pause to do that?
Click to expand...


The same argument could be thrown at you, and everyone else who has bought into the MSM narrative.

At what point do you admit that the evidence is serious enough to warrant serious investigation?

What is at stake is the integrity of the democratic process. In fact, the stakes could not be any higher. I simply do not understand your "so what!" attitude to something that lies at the very heart of our freedom.

I am not the idiot in this debate. You are, and you need to reflect on that.
 
PJS - BACK AND BOSSING IT said:
So the election will be decided in the courts, not at the polls.


However, Mr Trump's efforts to overturn the result suffered three setbacks on Friday:

  • In Arizona, his team dropped a lawsuit seeking a review of ballots cast on Election Day after it became clear his rival's lead was unassailable. The challenge was based on a claim that some legal votes had been rejected
  • In Michigan, a judge rejected a request by two Republican poll watchers - who had alleged fraud in Wayne County - to block the certification of election results in Detroit
  • In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Trump campaign's requests to invalidate several batches of mail-in ballots were rejected
Click to expand...


Trump expects to lose at this level, especially in courts that are sympathetic to the Democrat corruption.

I think they have always banked on getting their claims before the Supreme Court.
 
Hoddle is a god said:
Trump expects to lose at this level, especially in courts that are sympathetic to the Democrat corruption.

I think they have always banked on getting their claims before the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...


Are you always this stupid or does it take dedication. I’m sure the piss weak evidence will stand up to greater scrutiny.
 
PJS - BACK AND BOSSING IT said:
Are you always this stupid or does it take dedication.
Click to expand...

Do you have to insult me, asshole?


I’m sure the piss weak evidence will stand up to greater scrutiny.
Click to expand...

Whether or not it's piss weak, it's evidence of fraud and vote rigging. Do you not think that the safest thing to do is to have that evidence examined?

Also, please explain this to me...

Why do you think it was that Joe Biden hid himself away in his basement in the last week of the election campaign, yet still managed to pull more votes than Obama, in States where Republicans took the Senate seats? Does that not raise any suspicions with you?
 
Hoddle is a god said:
The same argument could be thrown at you, and everyone else who has bought into the MSM narrative.

At what point do you admit that the evidence is serious enough to warrant serious investigation?

What is at stake is the integrity of the democratic process. In fact, the stakes could not be any higher. I simply do not understand your "so what!" attitude to something that lies at the very heart of our freedom.

I am not the idiot in this debate. You are, and you need to reflect on that.
Click to expand...

That may be so mate but you quoted a CNN article in which the bloke has simply said that federal investigators have told the attorney general they've not found any substantial voter fraud. And that a couple of lawyers acting for Trump have withdrawn from the cases. And that cases are being dismissed in court.

Your response was to slate CNN but not actually respond to what they were reporting. Which is why I asked the question in the previous post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole and Peej
Hoddle is a god said:
The same argument could be thrown at you, and everyone else who has bought into the MSM narrative.

At what point do you admit that the evidence is serious enough to warrant serious investigation?

What is at stake is the integrity of the democratic process. In fact, the stakes could not be any higher. I simply do not understand your "so what!" attitude to something that lies at the very heart of our freedom.

I am not the idiot in this debate. You are, and you need to reflect on that.
Click to expand...
You have literally no interest in the actual truth though imo, just like the rest of the Trump supporters who simply can’t accept his electoral defeat.

Hence the reason you’re prepared to grasp at any straw that suits the false and completely baseless narrative that he spun, when defeat became obvious. Like the utterly ludicrous narrative you posted earlier today where you not only stated there’d been definitive mass electoral fraud, you also concluded that COVID was all part of the Democrats sinister plot.

This debacle isn’t about mass electoral fraud, it’s about people blinded by their own bias being unable to accept simple and straightforward reality - lead by the Narcissist in Chief Trump. Narcissists following a Narcissist, who knew......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson owns Fosse, DerekTheMole, CFC: Champs £launderx17 and 1 other person
Treble said:
That may be so mate but you quoted a CNN article in which the bloke has simply said that federal investigators have told the attorney general they've not found any substantial voter fraud. And that a couple of lawyers acting for Trump have withdrawn from the cases. And that cases are being dismissed in court.

Your response was to slate CNN but not actually respond to what they were reporting. Which is why I asked the question in the previous post.
Click to expand...


The problem with CNN is that it doesn't portray anything other than that which reflects badly on Trump. That's what it's been doing for 4 years solid.

I don't take anything it says seriously, because I can smell the narrative a mile off.
 
Hoddle is a god said:
Do you have to insult me, asshole?




Whether or not it's piss weak, it's evidence of fraud and vote rigging. Do you not think that the safest thing to do is to have that evidence examined?

Also, please explain this to me...

Why do you think it was that Joe Biden hid himself away in his basement in the last week of the election campaign, yet still managed to pull more votes than Obama, in States where Republicans took the Senate seats? Does that not raise any suspicions with you?
Click to expand...

Many Republicans, like Anthony Scaramucci, voted against him but voted for Republican congressmen and senators. Simples.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back