US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..


  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hear you, brother.

Unfortunately, the MSM fanboys will now mark you down as a conspiracy theorist, and will now discount anything you write on this subject. They do not want to consider the possibility that the vote was systematically rigged by the Democrats, because that will force them into admitting the possibility that Trump will win - and that is something anathema to them.

However, on behalf of the few of us on this board who have the courage and the intelligence to think critically (whether or not we accept Trump's politics) and who believe that the principles of democracy ought to be held sacrosanct above party politics, welcome, my friend.

No comment yet on voter suppression via defunding of the USPS, removing mail boxes and key sorting equipment.

we’re these ballots all in favour of democrats?
 
Roger, I looked at a few of your videos, and they don't really prove anything on the scale that Trump has always been alluding to.

Does mail fraud happen, of course it does, we'd have to be pretty naive to think it dont. I vote by postal ballot in the UK, it always crosses my mind what if....and here is the problem, it's this what if, that I think that Trump is playing on.

Whatever is found as evidence, and there will be evidence, I don't deny that, but it will never be to the level Trump claims, nor would it have had the slightest bit of affect on the outcome.

Afterall we don't even know who the fraudsters in each individual case voted for, example....there was an interview with a woman on the media a week or two back who was a staunch republican and she openly admitted she voted twice in a previous election for which she had been prosecuted.

In short, Trump is pissing in the wind. The dead people, the spouses whose votes were stolen, mail fraud, will never equate to the numbers Trump needs, even if someone binned a couple of thousand which were in his favour. He lost fair and square, all that is left that needs to happen is for him to do the honourable thing, put his big boy pants on. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
So instead of calling people let the courts decide, there was 3 years of russian collusion paid for by the Clinton foundation, when that failed impeachment, quid pro quo only for Biden to be proven as the one using quid pro quo, Me i'm not that keen on Trump but will defend free speech i see to mant ****s burning looting and shooting to get their way oh then there is .I've had enough of the communist ****
 
Roger, I looked at a few of your videos, and they don't really prove anything on the scale that Trump has always been alluding to.

Does mail fraud happen, of course it does, we'd have to be pretty naive to think it dont. I vote by postal ballot in the UK, it always crosses my mind what if....and here is the problem, it's this what if, that I think that Trump is playing on.

Whatever is found as evidence, and there will be evidence, I don't deny that, but it will never be to the level Trump claims, nor would it have had the slightest bit of affect on the outcome.

Afterall we don't even know who the fraudsters in each individual case voted for, example....there was an interview with a woman on the media a week or two back who was a staunch republican and she openly admitted she voted twice in a previous election for which she had been prosecuted.

In short, Trump is pissing in the wind. The dead people, the spouses whose votes were stolen, mail fraud, will never equate to the numbers Trump needs, even if someone binned a couple of thousand which were in his favour. He lost fair and square, all that is left that needs to happen is for him to do the honourable thing, put his big boy pants on. <ok>
maybe he is but thats for the courts to decide, and he still has 11 weeks left to prove it or go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
maybe he is but thats for the courts to decide, and he still has 11 weeks left to prove it or go.

He does and you are right. I just think he's completely wasting his time and money, but he has the fairness of democracy on his side, so his claims need to be looked into. I just think it's an awful waste of money and time, but if he proves me wrong, I'll come back here and say so. <ok>
 
So instead of calling people let the courts decide, there was 3 years of russian collusion paid for by the Clinton foundation, when that failed impeachment, quid pro quo only for Biden to be proven as the one using quid pro quo, Me i'm not that keen on Trump but will defend free speech i see to mant ****s burning looting and shooting to get their way oh then there is .I've had enough of the communist ****
The courts can and will decide if actual factual evidence of widespread vote rigging is put to them, I’ve no issue with that whatsoever, but you’re posting supposed ‘evidence’ of mass wrong doing which is nothing of the sort.

Communists? Wtf? <laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.