Off Topic Coronavirus

[Goldhawk-Road]

I'm a woman u sexist piece of sxxt

Ok, that's shoved into my memory bank.

 

[Stroller]

Apparently Johnson has decided to cancel Brexit after Sturgeon said it was bad idea.

 

[colognehornet]

I wish I wasn´t correct but their time frame ends 2030 (Agenda 21 & Agenda 2030) which can be easily looked up in the internet. They give it nice names, friendly wording but the intention is to enslave us all - or getting rid of us (depopulation, that is what Gates & Co. are talking about all the time).

Some people are getting mad at me here if I do recall what "Orwell" reported some 70 years ago and...

... they try to change the language all the time
....they try to erase history (BLM etc.)
....they try to put Gender before Sex
....they are imposing total surveillance
....

...and now they have managed to lock us up for several months, destroying the Economy (which will NEVER recover as it was their intention to do so), keeping us away from our parents in nurse homes and even tormenting our children with useless masks.

This is all happening right now in front of us but of course some countries are better off (right now) than others which doesn´t mean anything for the near future. Those are just different testing grounds - example:

There is a treaty between Canada and Netherlands - The Known Traveller Digital Identity-Projekt.

This is how it is supposed to work: We fill a database with reliable information about us, more precisely, we ask or authorize others to enter data about us there. First of all, this should be a proof of identity, but also our travel history, bank data, hotel accommodation, rental car bookings, documents from universities, government offices and much more. If we want to cross a border, we voluntarily give the authorities access to this data so that they can convince themselves beforehand that we are harmless. Using facial recognition and our (ideally) biometrically linked smartphone, they can convince themselves at the border crossing that we are who we claim to be. If we are diligent enough to collect digital receipts and have been generous enough with this data, we will be rewarded by being allowed to walk past the queues of other travelers, receiving preferential treatment and minimal checks. However, if there is any doubt about a traveler's intentions, the border official can, based on the information provided, "ask him/her more in-depth questions, for example to better understand his/her recent activities.

It is easy to imagine how "voluntary" this data sharing will be once the system is established. The test run is being carried out by the border authorities of Canada and the Netherlands, with the airlines KLM and Air Canada at Amsterdam, Toronto and Montreal airports.

Companies like Visa and Google are of course not so committed to developing such a system for the police authorities at their own expense purely out of a sense of civic duty. Rather, the border authorities are declared to be the ideal catalyst for such a system of self-monitoring and data sharing in which all governments of the world are to be gradually integrated. For if one government does not cooperate, its citizens will at some point be able to travel internationally only with great difficulty.

The first report, as well as the current White Paper, states that self-monitoring at the border serves only to create an initial critical mass of participants in the global standard that is to be introduced. If this is successful, if all governments have adopted this standard for the forced voluntary exchange of data with citizens, then we will be allowed to give away our data "for everyday applications" in interaction with companies and authorities (bolded in the original). In both reports, health, education and training, banking, humanitarian aid and elections are the main areas mentioned.

That´s the way it is happening, step by step and most people are happy ignoring those changes. They just hate people telling them the truth rather than acting together against such a dystopian future.

I read as far as the first half sentence of this drivel namely ''I wish I wasn't correct'' - which in itself is a load of bollocks. It is bollocks because the last thing you want to see happen is that there is an end to this crisis - if there were then you would have to summon up another Qanon conspiracy theory from somewhere. If everything settled down and got back to normal and your 'Great Reset' just didn't happen !! - the truth is that you want this crisis to continue just to fulfill your bizarre prophecies.

 

[colognehornet]

There will be around 3 - 4 million anti-corona protesters in Berlin on August 29th. The number of "woke" people is contineously rising as they do at last understand what is at stake. The actions that have been taken in Australia show that they are trying to build up police states everywhere and of course they do use testing grounds. Step by step reducing human rights and it is obvious there are a lot of very stupid people around accepting/appreciating wearing muzzles.

The Great Reset is the only reason why this is happening. Lack of education the reason why so many people fall for that hoax.

Yet more bollocks - there are 17,000 expected for this demo. This is the number which has been registered with the police by the organizers.

 

[ELLERS]

Ok, that's shoved into my memory bank.

 

[rangercol]

Well that only took 12 hours for a U turn, and my prediction to be correct. My fastest yet.

Face coverings mandatory for secondary school pupils....

I am not sure this government can do sensible thoughts anymore..
Neatly every decision is changed. Nearly every decision is a u-turn

Do you disagree with the decision Beth?

 

[Staines R's]

Well that only took 12 hours for a U turn, and my prediction to be correct. My fastest yet.

Face coverings mandatory for secondary school pupils....

I am not sure this government can do sensible thoughts anymore..
Neatly every decision is changed. Nearly every decision is a u-turn

Eh ? I was reading that face masks for kids in schools will only be mandatory in towns and cities that are subject to stricter COVID controls ?
Are you spreading misinformation Beth or has that changed ?

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Apparently Johnson has decided to cancel Brexit after Sturgeon said it was bad idea.

They’ll let Scotland leave the Customs Union for a few weeks to see how it goes before committing to a final decision.

 

[qprbeth]

Eh ? I was reading that face masks for kids in schools will only be mandatory in towns and cities that are subject to stricter COVID controls ?
Are you spreading misinformation Beth or has that changed ?

No that changed from last night to this morning....look at the first press realeaee

But Gavin Williamson said this morning the full implementation in any school is up to individual headmasters.

So the government is actually transfering responsibility again downwards... complete lack of leadership and straight answers.

Take Birmingham city which was on the government watchlist ( but thankfully the r rate is on its way down currently)...what do schools do there...wait for a full lockdown or take precautionary measures...and when...and when and who enforces it

 

[qprbeth]

Do you disagree with the decision Beth?

In fact I don't disagree with it..I think youngsters are fully capable of transmitting the virus, and most will be nearly assymptomatic. The " current folklaw" is that much transmission is through the young...and we only see the effects when an older/ vunerable person gets it.

I would have it fully in place in all areas of social gathering...in playgrounds, corridors halls etc in secondary schools.

It is the lack of solid decisions , confused thinking and constant uturns that gets my goat.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

No that changed from last night to this morning....look at the first press realeaee

But Gavin Williamson said this morning the full implementation in any school is up to individual headmasters.

So the government is actually transfering responsibility again downwards... complete lack of leadership and straight answers.

Take Birmingham city which was on the government watchlist ( but thankfully the r rate is on its way down currently)...what do schools do there...wait for a full lockdown or take precautionary measures...and when...and when and who enforces it

Boris was quick to give his thoughts on Land of Hope and Glory. Give him a chance to think about trivial stuff like this.

 

[qprbeth]

This is a real genuine question. Honest I am not making a point

I thought atoat least PART of the reason was that we are currently not allowed to sing in groups .

So land of hope and glory would not work.

Have I got this wrong

 

[Staines R's]

No that changed from last night to this morning....look at the first press realeaee

But Gavin Williamson said this morning the full implementation in any school is up to individual headmasters.

So the government is actually transfering responsibility again downwards... complete lack of leadership and straight answers.

Take Birmingham city which was on the government watchlist ( but thankfully the r rate is on its way down currently)...what do schools do there...wait for a full lockdown or take precautionary measures...and when...and when and who enforces it

Not taking the governments side, but there was a head teacher on BBC news welcoming the stance from the government, saying that giving individual headmasters the responsibility to decide for themselves a very sensible and wise thing to do......something I tend to agree with.
Do you agree or disagree?

NB Sorry Beth, could you post up the original press release saying that face masks would be mandatory in ALL schools......I can’t find it anywhere (though if you say that’s what it said I’ve no reason to disbelieve you just I can’t find it)

 

[Staines R's]

This is a real genuine question. Honest I am not making a point

I thought atoat least PART of the reason was that we are currently not allowed to sing in groups .

So land of hope and glory would not work.

Have I got this wrong

Sorry Beth, I haven’t a clue what you are talking about.

 

[ELLERS]

This is a real genuine question. Honest I am not making a point

I thought atoat least PART of the reason was that we are currently not allowed to sing in groups .

So land of hope and glory would not work.

Have I got this wrong

No singing this year but back next year. BBC did a U-turn ( if that’s what they call it)

 

[qprbeth]

No singing this year but back next year. BBC did a U-turn ( if that’s what they call it)

Thank you

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

True patriots like me sing Land of Hope and Glory before bed every evening anyway.

 

[qprbeth]

Not taking the governments side, but there was a head teacher on BBC news welcoming the stance from the government, saying that giving individual headmasters the responsibility to decide for themselves a very sensible and wise thing to do......something I tend to agree with.
Do you agree or disagree?

NB Sorry Beth, could you post up the original press release saying that face masks would be mandatory in ALL schools......I can’t find it anywhere (though if you say that’s what it said I’ve no reason to disbelieve you just I can’t find it)

Will do, when I can find it too...it came as newsflash on my phone about 10.30 last night.

It was a small paragraph with no provision for choice.

Yes it is good that individual headmasters have the choice...BUT ( in reality) will that not cause chaos if the parent disagrees with whatever the decision is made.

It is why total lockdown worked...and why it didn't work when the edges got fluffy

 

[qprbeth]

This is what I received last night it was from skynews breaking news.

Boris Johnson has abandoned advice that pupils should not wear face masks in English secondary schools.

The prime minister performed his latest U-turn in the face of growing pressure from headteachers, teaching unions and medical experts.

 

[Staines R's]

Will do, when I can find it too...it came as newsflash on my phone about 10.30 last night.

It was a small paragraph with no provision for choice.

Yes it is good that individual headmasters have the choice...BUT ( in reality) will that not cause chaos if the parent disagrees with whatever the decision is made.

It is why total lockdown worked...and why it didn't work when the edges got fluffy

But surely whether the a parent agrees or disagrees (which from my experience at least one parent with disagree with ANY decision made by the school), the ultimate decision lies with the headmaster, like it or lump it. If the said parent then decides to take matters further and take their child out of school then so be it....they should be prepared to face the consequences of their actions. It’s really not that hard in my opinion.