Off Topic OLOF's political thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
@
That's not how it looks, in my opinion if I look back at the interchange between you, Shaks and Glory, this gang culture you seem to despise was used to great effect to goad and provoke with the obvious consequences. Only my opinion I know but that's how it looked when I read it back. It might not have been your intent but the results are there for all to see. Again in my opinion LL shouldn't have been around to post what he did. He hadn't changed in all the time I've been posting and was quite frankly, again in my opinion, beyond the limit with many posts. The rest as they say is history.

I certainly don't want to carry on with this tit-for-tat it's not a good read. I didn't ask for LL to be banned I said he had broken, in my opinion, the rules of the site and should be sanctioned. In the next post Ristac said he was going to be warned and that was that, or so I thought.

I feel offended that you posted that I asked for him to be banned but hey if you don't want to say you got it wrong then that's up to you I'm not going to lose any sleep.
Me and Glory disagreed on him being banned, which led to arguments, I told brb that if he was banning Glory for arguing with me, I was as much at fault if not more so, brb told me that wasn't the reason, it was Glorys constant demands the mods take action, on illigal posts, now I don't know how much you remember, but Glory has made threats of reporting the site and mods to different authorities in the past, brb took his latest posts as a vailed threat by the look of it, and banned him again as he never wanted him back in the first place.
Now brb did say you were the only person who had complained about LL, he invited any more who felt the same to do the same and a fair few did, so it looks like he altered the post to many complaints and he's now banned. Not sure why you took, great offence at me quoting what brb said, I didn't have any problem with it, and wasn't slagging you for doing it, just mearly telling 20/20 what had happened. I didn't say you asked for him to be banned, just that brb said you were the first to complain, followed by others.
I don't agree with banning any Leeds fans, and even defended you when you got banned.;)
You haven't seen all that's been going on, eg Glory apologiseing to Shako by PM, while slagging him and me on other social media, it was brought to my attention after his ban, so you would be correct in assuming I won't be asking for his return again.
 
Last edited:
Me and Glory disagreed on him being banned, which led to arguments, I told brb that if he was banning Glory for arguing with me, I was as much at fault if not more so, brb told me that wasn't the reason, it was Glorys constant demands the mods take action, on illigal posts, now I don't know how much you remember, but Glory has made threats of reporting the site and mods to different authorities in the past, brb took his latest posts as a vailed threat by the look of it, and banned him again as he never wanted him back in the first place.
Now brb did say you were the only person who had complained about LL, he invited any more who felt the same to do the same and a fair few did, so it looks like he altered the post to many complaints and he's now banned. Not sure why you took, great offence at me quoting what brb said, I didn't have any problem with it, and wasn't slagging you for doing it, just mearly telling 20/20 what had happened. I didn't say you asked for him to be banned, just that brb said you were the first to complain, followed by others.
Fair does, views can differ.

In your post to Wakey not 20/20 that I referenced earlier you didn't say brb said etc you said:
You must log in or register to see images


Which is why I took umbrage with you, they are your words. Enough said though I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ristac
Fair does, views can differ.

In your post to Wakey not 20/20 that I referenced earlier you didn't say brb said etc you said:
You must log in or register to see images


Which is why I took umbrage with you, they are your words. Enough said though I guess.
Yes my mistake, Wakey not 20/20,brb asked for people's opinions on LL, he only mentioned you by name, and changed it to many after, I didn't mean to single you out as some sort of grass, if that's what you thought I was doing, and have no problem with you giving your opinion to brb, which he asked for.
 
I can't keep up with who likes who since I haven't been on here that long but the arguing is becoming tedious.

Can I again suggest an argument thread so the rest of us don't have to wade through pages of the bickering.

Posters have been banned. We all know why because it's been done to death. Whether I agree with it or not is irrelevant because I can't do anything about it.
 
I can't keep up with who likes who since I haven't been on here that long but the arguing is becoming tedious.

Can I again suggest an argument thread so the rest of us don't have to wade through pages of the bickering.

Posters have been banned. We all know why because it's been done to death. Whether I agree with it or not is irrelevant because I can't do anything about it.
That's why we have the politics thread, it was set up to keep the footy threads clear.<ok>
Unfortunately Blono, there is/was a lot of baggage between certain posters, including myself.<ok>
 
I think it’s really excellent that people are confessing to their support for racism and slavery like this.

I’d like to admit to being a supporter of slavery too. A few years ago my wife and I, while on a holiday in the ex slave state of Georgia (I’ll send an apology for even going there, later), went round an old plantation estate and house. Only 150 years or so earlier it had contained slaves so clearly our day trip out was not to have a pleasant trip out and learn something of local history, it was to announce clearly my support for the KKK, stringing up n****** and the institution of slavery.

Or not. What bollox this all is.

if lefty snowflakes like me are getting annoyed by this crap, it shows you how much harm this over the top political correctness is doing to Undermine what is a Legitimate concerm.


https://news.sky.com/story/amp/ryan...r-wedding-at-former-slave-plantation-12042673
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-8-5_8-54-40.jpeg
    upload_2020-8-5_8-54-40.jpeg
    58.1 KB · Views: 1
  • upload_2020-8-5_8-54-40.png
    upload_2020-8-5_8-54-40.png
    453.3 KB · Views: 1
  • upload_2020-8-5_8-55-47.jpeg
    upload_2020-8-5_8-55-47.jpeg
    58.4 KB · Views: 1
  • upload_2020-8-5_8-55-47.png
    upload_2020-8-5_8-55-47.png
    472.3 KB · Views: 1
I think it’s really excellent that people are confessing to their support for racism and slavery like this.

I’d like to admit to being a supporter of slavery too. A few years ago my wife and I, while on a holiday in the ex slave state of Georgia (I’ll send an apology for even going there, later), went round an old plantation estate and house. Only 150 years or so earlier it had contained slaves so clearly our day trip out was not to have a pleasant trip out and learn something of local history, it was to announce clearly my support for the KKK, stringing up n****** and the institution of slavery.

Or not. What bollox this all is.

if lefty snowflakes like me are getting annoyed by this crap, it shows you how much harm this over the top political correctness is doing to Undermine what is a Legitimate concerm.


https://news.sky.com/story/amp/ryan...r-wedding-at-former-slave-plantation-12042673
You've been turned.