@
Now brb did say you were the only person who had complained about LL, he invited any more who felt the same to do the same and a fair few did, so it looks like he altered the post to many complaints and he's now banned. Not sure why you took, great offence at me quoting what brb said, I didn't have any problem with it, and wasn't slagging you for doing it, just mearly telling 20/20 what had happened. I didn't say you asked for him to be banned, just that brb said you were the first to complain, followed by others.
I don't agree with banning any Leeds fans, and even defended you when you got banned.
You haven't seen all that's been going on, eg Glory apologiseing to Shako by PM, while slagging him and me on other social media, it was brought to my attention after his ban, so you would be correct in assuming I won't be asking for his return again.
Me and Glory disagreed on him being banned, which led to arguments, I told brb that if he was banning Glory for arguing with me, I was as much at fault if not more so, brb told me that wasn't the reason, it was Glorys constant demands the mods take action, on illigal posts, now I don't know how much you remember, but Glory has made threats of reporting the site and mods to different authorities in the past, brb took his latest posts as a vailed threat by the look of it, and banned him again as he never wanted him back in the first place.That's not how it looks, in my opinion if I look back at the interchange between you, Shaks and Glory, this gang culture you seem to despise was used to great effect to goad and provoke with the obvious consequences. Only my opinion I know but that's how it looked when I read it back. It might not have been your intent but the results are there for all to see. Again in my opinion LL shouldn't have been around to post what he did. He hadn't changed in all the time I've been posting and was quite frankly, again in my opinion, beyond the limit with many posts. The rest as they say is history.
I certainly don't want to carry on with this tit-for-tat it's not a good read. I didn't ask for LL to be banned I said he had broken, in my opinion, the rules of the site and should be sanctioned. In the next post Ristac said he was going to be warned and that was that, or so I thought.
I feel offended that you posted that I asked for him to be banned but hey if you don't want to say you got it wrong then that's up to you I'm not going to lose any sleep.
Now brb did say you were the only person who had complained about LL, he invited any more who felt the same to do the same and a fair few did, so it looks like he altered the post to many complaints and he's now banned. Not sure why you took, great offence at me quoting what brb said, I didn't have any problem with it, and wasn't slagging you for doing it, just mearly telling 20/20 what had happened. I didn't say you asked for him to be banned, just that brb said you were the first to complain, followed by others.
I don't agree with banning any Leeds fans, and even defended you when you got banned.
You haven't seen all that's been going on, eg Glory apologiseing to Shako by PM, while slagging him and me on other social media, it was brought to my attention after his ban, so you would be correct in assuming I won't be asking for his return again.
Last edited:


or the Bring back you know who brigade...
