Off Topic Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'm not a betting man, but I have a sinking feeling that come the next due pay day at end of April, this 80% pay furlough scheme will not be ready.
I forsee trouble ahead as millions I reckon will suddenly find no money in their banks for May.
Of course I might be totally wrong and will be positive news :-)
 
I'm not a betting man, but I have a sinking feeling that come the next due pay day at end of April, this 80% pay furlough scheme will not be ready.
I forsee trouble ahead as millions I reckon will suddenly find no money in their banks for May.
Of course I might be totally wrong and will be positive news :)
It's a concern and some clarity needed especially for the self employed
 
I'm not a betting man, but I have a sinking feeling that come the next due pay day at end of April, this 80% pay furlough scheme will not be ready.
I forsee trouble ahead as millions I reckon will suddenly find no money in their banks for May.
Of course I might be totally wrong and will be positive news :)



Wanna bet


I see your bet and raise you !

Seriously though, hope everyone gets their payments through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wherever and bobmid
For those who point out that most care homes are run for profit by private owners and that the government shouldn't be blamed for lack of PPE in them. Would you support the government taking this sector into public control, under the NHS umbrella (i.e. effectively nationalised)?
Well, ideally I would like them to be worker run self managing collectives, but that’s just me. I think they should be free for residents as well.

I don’t see why nationalising stuff would make it better. It’s a very old fashioned solution which didn’t work particularly well for loads of things in the sixties and seventies. The state isn’t necessarily efficient, caring or even benign, let alone competent. And it likes to do things on the cheap.

In the absence of the revolution, why not have a look at the German system, where health and social care is not provided by the state, there is a lot more of it available than there is here, and it seems to be of higher quality, and it is accessible to all regardless of income. It’s also paid for in a much more transparent and non political way, with the key being proper regulation. The most anybody pays is €450 a month (if you earn over €60k a year) including for your non working dependants. Your employer pays a similar amount. The funds are managed through state regulated Sick Funds. I’m sure it’s not perfect but looks attractive to me.
 
Last edited:
I fear we are reopening because other countries are...and our leaders do not want to be left behind.
Our numbers in high dependancy hospital beds is decreasing, but not our death rate yet.
I do hope we use some restraint, and use some caution even if we are a little behind other countries.

We will not be so well behaved if we all have to go into lockdown for a second wave.

Off to see if I can wrestle the paper of the hubbie now
Front page story has elements of the reopening plan, which has over 70s in lockdown until autumn 2021. But the pubs open by late summer this year.

My mum (80) will tear someone’s lungs out if they suggest that to her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qprbeth and kiwiqpr
Well, ideally I would like them to be worker run self managing collectives, but that’s just me. I think they should be free for residents as well.

I don’t see why nationalising stuff would make it better. It’s a very old fashioned solution which didn’t work particularly well for loads of things in the sixties and seventies. The state isn’t necessarily efficient, caring or even benign, let alone competent. And it likes to do things on the cheap.

In the absence of the revolution, why not have a look at the German system, where health and social care is not provided by the state, there is a lot more of it available than there is here, and it seems to be of higher quality. It’s also paid for in a much more transparent and non political way, with the key being proper regulation. The most anybody pays is €450 a month (if you earn over €60k a year) including for your non working dependants. Your employer pays a similar amount. The funds are managed through state regulated Sick Funds. I’m sure it’s not perfect but looks attractive to me.

Surely the German system is controlled by the state even if care is not provided by the state?
 
Surely the German system is controlled by the state even if care is not provided by the state?
Yes, through regulation. But the state doesn’t own the assets of the system, which it would through nationalisation. It’s socialised health Strolls, just not centralised socialised health like we have. And it covers social care as part of the overall package.
 
Yes, through regulation. But the state doesn’t own the assets of the system, which it would through nationalisation. It’s socialised health Strolls, just not centralised socialised health like we have. And it covers social care as part of the overall package.

Which is fine, but dependant on how strict, or otherwise, the regulation is and how universal the provision is.
 
Oh come on Col, I’m not having that. Don’t make him out to be some bullied misunderstood soul. He is the one who puts people down, and then when they bite back he plays the ‘I’m being bullied’ card.....it’s pathetic.

Not getting drawn in mate.
I said he can be his own worst enemy, did you not notice that bit?
Fault on all sides.
 
Okay firstly SB you choose countries that will favor your argument. Strangely you omitted France, Italy, Spain which are more of a representation as to size and population to the UK (as well as distance)
However, I will attempt to go through the interesting ones.


Denmark… Don’t be silly they only have about 5 million people?
Singapore… sorry, don’t know enough about coronavirus there.
Hong Kong… really? Have figures overseen by the Chinese government? I would always be skeptical about what comes out of there, however, a highly populated place so would have been good to collect information.

Let us discuss the ones we can trust…

Germany
It would be the nearest example to us and the most interesting case.
It has been well documented that Germany has a very good health care system as well as those 100 labs compared to our 4. It has amazing Pharma manufacturing and can deal with producing stuff very quickly.
Do you believe that Germany gets its testing kits from China? I bet they don’t rely on China as much as we do?
There have also been questions on how they record deaths. Plenty of articles will tell you this.

Lothar Wieler, president of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the federal government’s health agency, has said the true mortality rate in Germany is probably higher than the officially recorded number. He reported on some tentative evidence that the number of new infections might be slowing down, but said it was too early to make firm conclusions.

https://www.ft.com/content/849308f8-75bc-11ea-ad98-044200cb277f

However, as I said Germany is a good example on the way forward. We are working closely with them… I think it was ‘Farrar’ (sorry for the wrong spelling). The medical director who confirmed this last week.
Finally, my mate works in German and he says they all pay into the medical system.

South Korea
This is an interesting example because they have high concentrations of people in a small space.

I recall reading a piece about the social and cultural differences which have helped them. A good example is when their government tells them to social distance or stay at home, the obey unlike people in the UK who often break the rules?
They also tested very quickly and managed to produce affordable testing kits. Whereas we have not been able to do that.
Funnily the best testing kits seem to be produced there and we may end up importing from them.

South Korea comes across as almost immune to it, which in itself is strange?
I also still think there are BAME links to consider in all of this.

I think in the end it comes down to political, social and cultural differences in each country. I don’t think it is fair/correct to compare us to another country. As long as we learn by our mistakes and take note of other successes then surely that is the way forward.
 
Okay firstly SB you choose countries that will favor your argument. Strangely you omitted France, Italy, Spain which are more of a representation as to size and population to the UK (as well as distance)
However, I will attempt to go through the interesting ones.


Denmark… Don’t be silly they only have about 5 million people?
Singapore… sorry, don’t know enough about coronavirus there.
Hong Kong… really? Have figures overseen by the Chinese government? I would always be skeptical about what comes out of there, however, a highly populated place so would have been good to collect information.

Let us discuss the ones we can trust…

Germany
It would be the nearest example to us and the most interesting case.
It has been well documented that Germany has a very good health care system as well as those 100 labs compared to our 4. It has amazing Pharma manufacturing and can deal with producing stuff very quickly.
Do you believe that Germany gets its testing kits from China? I bet they don’t rely on China as much as we do?
There have also been questions on how they record deaths. Plenty of articles will tell you this.

Lothar Wieler, president of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the federal government’s health agency, has said the true mortality rate in Germany is probably higher than the officially recorded number. He reported on some tentative evidence that the number of new infections might be slowing down, but said it was too early to make firm conclusions.

https://www.ft.com/content/849308f8-75bc-11ea-ad98-044200cb277f

However, as I said Germany is a good example on the way forward. We are working closely with them… I think it was ‘Farrar’ (sorry for the wrong spelling). The medical director who confirmed this last week.
Finally, my mate works in German and he says they all pay into the medical system.

South Korea
This is an interesting example because they have high concentrations of people in a small space.

I recall reading a piece about the social and cultural differences which have helped them. A good example is when their government tells them to social distance or stay at home, the obey unlike people in the UK who often break the rules?
They also tested very quickly and managed to produce affordable testing kits. Whereas we have not been able to do that.
Funnily the best testing kits seem to be produced there and we may end up importing from them.

South Korea comes across as almost immune to it, which in itself is strange?
I also still think there are BAME links to consider in all of this.

I think in the end it comes down to political, social and cultural differences in each country. I don’t think it is fair/correct to compare us to another country. As long as we learn by our mistakes and take note of other successes then surely that is the way forward.
Definitely not fair/correct to compare us to another country, so much so you just wrote a whole post on doing that?!?!?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
Okay firstly SB you choose countries that will favor your argument. Strangely you omitted France, Italy, Spain which are more of a representation as to size and population to the UK (as well as distance)
However, I will attempt to go through the interesting ones.


Denmark… Don’t be silly they only have about 5 million people?
Singapore… sorry, don’t know enough about coronavirus there.
Hong Kong… really? Have figures overseen by the Chinese government? I would always be skeptical about what comes out of there, however, a highly populated place so would have been good to collect information.

Let us discuss the ones we can trust…

Germany
It would be the nearest example to us and the most interesting case.
It has been well documented that Germany has a very good health care system as well as those 100 labs compared to our 4. It has amazing Pharma manufacturing and can deal with producing stuff very quickly.
Do you believe that Germany gets its testing kits from China? I bet they don’t rely on China as much as we do?
There have also been questions on how they record deaths. Plenty of articles will tell you this.

Lothar Wieler, president of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the federal government’s health agency, has said the true mortality rate in Germany is probably higher than the officially recorded number. He reported on some tentative evidence that the number of new infections might be slowing down, but said it was too early to make firm conclusions.

https://www.ft.com/content/849308f8-75bc-11ea-ad98-044200cb277f

However, as I said Germany is a good example on the way forward. We are working closely with them… I think it was ‘Farrar’ (sorry for the wrong spelling). The medical director who confirmed this last week.
Finally, my mate works in German and he says they all pay into the medical system.

South Korea
This is an interesting example because they have high concentrations of people in a small space.

I recall reading a piece about the social and cultural differences which have helped them. A good example is when their government tells them to social distance or stay at home, the obey unlike people in the UK who often break the rules?
They also tested very quickly and managed to produce affordable testing kits. Whereas we have not been able to do that.
Funnily the best testing kits seem to be produced there and we may end up importing from them.

South Korea comes across as almost immune to it, which in itself is strange?
I also still think there are BAME links to consider in all of this.

I think in the end it comes down to political, social and cultural differences in each country. I don’t think it is fair/correct to compare us to another country. As long as we learn by our mistakes and take note of other successes then surely that is the way forward.

You asked me for examples of countries who were coping better than we are yesterday and even said you’d enjoy how easily you’d prove me wrong (or similar). Now it’s not fair to do so.

You can’t just write Denmark off for having a 5m population. So does Scotland more or less.

South Koreans aren’t immune. They’re a textbook example of what can be achieved with near perfect and incredibly rapid ‘ramping up’ of testing and tracing. Similarly Taiwan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr and bobmid
There are others who constantly make childish, sarcastic comments, either about the **** situation we're in or other posters.

Ellers can be his own worst enemy and can stick up for himself, but I find the constant picking on him a little wearing.

As I say, I'm probably suffering a bit from all this ****.

Time for a walk!!
I can't see what a couple of them are posting by I bet they are still bitching about me? Why can't some move on? I actually enjoy not reading some posts now and enjoy it more.
 
You asked me for examples of countries who were coping better than we are yesterday and even said you’d enjoy how easily you’d prove me wrong (or similar). Now it’s not fair to do so.

You can’t just write Denmark off for having a 5m population. So does Scotland more or less.

South Koreans aren’t immune. They’re a textbook example of what can be achieved with near perfect and incredibly rapid ‘ramping up’ of testing and tracing. Similarly Taiwan.

You like misquoting don't you Watford... I said
"South Korea comes across as almost immune to it" I never said "they were immune"

Also, I was replying to Sb, not you.