Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aye it's great for pneumonia which is a big plus don't get me wrong.

But what about the agonising, suffocating blood vomit induced death caused by the actual virus?

The lung infection is caused by the virus, the infection does the damage, ie punching holes in lungs, the treatment aims to deal with the infection and reduce or prevent damage from it.

In some cases multiple organ failure happens, and this would do nothing for that.

Besides, its needed because this is going to keep popping up briefly after the main outbreak.
 
Meanwhile in ‘Merica

You must log in or register to see media

from your tweeted story "The toxic ingredient they consumed was not the medication form of chloroquine, used to treat malaria in humans. Instead, it was an ingredient listed on a parasite treatment for fish". Being a very long time fishkeeper, I tell you it is more than likely it was also contaminated with other stuff that was probably toxic as well because fish medicines, no regulations.

Headline is misleading, because we dont know what else was in that medicine, which may have been more lethal.


He and his wife ate fish medicine! wtf <doh>

GUARANTEED the packaging had a warning too <doh> <doh>


EDIT
From WAPO "That pharmaceutical name matched the label on a bottle of chemicals they used to clean their koi pond" It was a chemical product used to kill parasites for koi ponds, it wasn't even a fish medicine. A pond cleaning product.

Essentially the equivalent of drinking bleach cos there is some H2O in it.
 
Last edited:
33 ? i assume they had an underlying illness?

I believe the answer to that to be yes. However, someone 39 years old also caught the virus that was reported on yesterday and are in hospital recovering, and I believe they did not have an underlying illness.
 
I believe the answer to that to be yes. However, someone 39 years old also caught the virus that was reported on yesterday and are in hospital recovering, and I believe they did not have an underlying illness.

great news
 
I wonder if the daft **** in the gym I spoke with a month ago is still convinced its all hype
 
great news

I have said before that the age group 20-30 is at risk. That was identified in Italy in the latter weeks of the virus treatment. The elderly had already taken the beds, so there was no room for the younger patients (20-30).
 
I have said before that the age group 20-30 is at risk. That was identified in Italy in the latter weeks of the virus treatment. The elderly had already taken the beds, so there was no room for the younger patients (20-30).

im ****ed then

look

You must log in or register to see images
 
Status
Not open for further replies.