Coronavirus

I meant them and everything in between. All of it.

"the sun" ewww

 

Spurt? That ship has sailed, more likely he'll be chasing complete strangers around trying to shove a soiled tissue up their twats

 

Besides HIAG, do you not keep all your jizz in a mayo jar and send it back to the holy land?

 

Latest research released by UCL suggests current UK policy will kill 35,000 - 70,000 over the next 12 months

 

No.

But, thinking about it, I think I will start doing that.

 

oh **** off!

 

Do UCL have an alternate plan that will save 35,000 - 70,000 over the next 12 months?

 

I forgot how many arseholes are on here .

banned is better.

@brb ban me again please

 

Should they shut up until they do?

 

No. Did anyone suggest they should?

Now feck off back up Stan's arse. There's a good puppy

 

Oh it’s you

Was there a point to your question about UCL then?

 

Well said

This is the trouble in this crisis, people failing to have self control!

 

The point of the question was to get an answer. Preferably not from a snide like yourself.

 

I've got the ****s. It's not pretty.
I'm out all day with my dogs. Wild garlic leaves for bog roll and to top it off one of my dogs likes nowt better than tucking in to one of my rancid turds. Dirty little bazza.

 

Glad to see you can continue to smile through these difficult times.

 

This thread was rolling along in quite an amusing manner and then you stop it dead with that.

 

There are a lot of models around with varying outcomes, this one seems a bit on the severe end tbh and I wonder how they get the 35k-70k range. 70k seems rather excessive, es

Quite a few of the projections for various countries have been of little value so far. If data is not corrected for cluster cases for example, like in the US, 54 fatal cases in one state but 27 of the deaths came from one nursing home where it got in, so their early projections were wrong, because they didnt correct for those 27 cases.

But the resulting calamity will end up in deaths for sure, putting numbers on it though, especially where the spread is larger than the low end, not much certainty in there

 

The research lists the actions that can be taken and their effect on the death rate.

The conclusion of the report is that the government need to adopt these more stringent actions.
The biggest thing they highlight is that 20% of the population have underlying conditions that make them high risk of mortality from corona but the government have so far only targeted 2.7% as high risk. The main reason for this is many people have multiple low risk conditions that combined put them at a higher risk that some of those currently identified.