Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apologies mate, 70's <ok>

If you can still get it up and have enough of a spurt to get it into the cup? Sadly, I fear the trickle will look more like a dripping tap.


Spurt? That ship has sailed, more likely he'll be chasing complete strangers around trying to shove a soiled tissue up their twats :bandit:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
Latest research released by UCL suggests current UK policy will kill 35,000 - 70,000 over the next 12 months
 
I've got the ****s. It's not pretty.
I'm out all day with my dogs. Wild garlic leaves for bog roll and to top it off one of my dogs likes nowt better than tucking in to one of my rancid turds. Dirty little bazza. <laugh>
 
I've got the ****s. It's not pretty.
I'm out all day with my dogs. Wild garlic leaves for bog roll and to top it off one of my dogs likes nowt better than tucking in to one of my rancid turds. Dirty little bazza. <laugh>
This thread was rolling along in quite an amusing manner and then you stop it dead with that.
 
Latest research released by UCL suggests current UK policy will kill 35,000 - 70,000 over the next 12 months


There are a lot of models around with varying outcomes, this one seems a bit on the severe end tbh and I wonder how they get the 35k-70k range. 70k seems rather excessive, es

Quite a few of the projections for various countries have been of little value so far. If data is not corrected for cluster cases for example, like in the US, 54 fatal cases in one state but 27 of the deaths came from one nursing home where it got in, so their early projections were wrong, because they didnt correct for those 27 cases.

But the resulting calamity will end up in deaths for sure, putting numbers on it though, especially where the spread is larger than the low end, not much certainty in there
 
Do UCL have an alternate plan that will save 35,000 - 70,000 over the next 12 months?

The research lists the actions that can be taken and their effect on the death rate.

The conclusion of the report is that the government need to adopt these more stringent actions.
The biggest thing they highlight is that 20% of the population have underlying conditions that make them high risk of mortality from corona but the government have so far only targeted 2.7% as high risk. The main reason for this is many people have multiple low risk conditions that combined put them at a higher risk that some of those currently identified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiddler
Status
Not open for further replies.