we all knew who Rock Hudson was.Remember when the AIDS epidemic broke and they said that we'd all know someone who would be affected by it?
That was a load of bullocks, too.
we all knew who Rock Hudson was.
Remember when the AIDS epidemic broke and they said that we'd all know someone who would be affected by it?
That was a load of bullocks, too.
we all knew who Rock Hudson was.
Remember when the AIDS epidemic broke and they said that we'd all know someone who would be affected by it?
That was a load of bullocks, too.
Remember when the AIDS epidemic broke and they said that we'd all know someone who would be affected by it?
That was a load of bullocks, too.
And Tom Hanks. That guy is so unlucky.we all knew who Rock Hudson was.
And Tom Hanks. That guy is so unlucky.
Hopefully justice will come though far far too lateMy mates Dad died from it after a contaminated transfusion, that he needed due to his haemophilia.
AIDS transmission slowed due to safe sex and a colossal public heath campaign. You sound like Anne Widdecombe you ****ing dickhead.

"Results: Cardiac complications were found in 42 of the 53 (79.25%) patients: tachycardia (n=15), electrocardiography abnormities (n=11), diastolic dysfunction (n=20), elevated myocardial enzymes (n=30), and AMI (n=6). "I can’t see anywhere in that where it says anything like that... can you give the quote?
you bastard i almost choked to death on a mouthful of ShirazYou must log in or register to see images

"Results: Cardiac complications were found in 42 of the 53 (79.25%) patients: tachycardia (n=15), electrocardiography abnormities (n=11), diastolic dysfunction (n=20), elevated myocardial enzymes (n=30), and AMI (n=6). "
Out of interest, why are you so keen to make out like it’s just a bit of a cold doing the rounds?Yeah that’s not saying 80% of people who get Covid will have ongoing heart problems, it’s referring to the people being studied who are part of the small % who get hospitalised. Unless I’m reading that wrong?
Think we need to be careful not to be spreading misinformation and panic by overstating the effect it has.
Out of interest, why are you so keen to make out like it’s just a bit of a cold doing the rounds?
I’ll leave LL to reply to the assertion that his comment was wildly inaccurate, although given what he does for a living I suspect he’s more clued up than most. Your entire approach to the issue has been “edgy” for want of a better word. No surprise that you’ve attracted the support of one of the forum’s chief deniers. There’s nothing to see here!I’m not - he posted a wildly inaccurate comment based on what the study he posted actually said which doesn’t help anything. I think it’s highly likely he just misread it (or I have!) so I’m not saying he is trying to overstate the effects on purpose. But I do think it’s dangerous to sensationalise things, it’s how we end up with ******s panic buying toilet roll.
I’ll leave LL to reply to the assertion that his comment was wildly inaccurate, although given what he does for a living I suspect he’s more clued up than most. Your entire approach to the issue has been “edgy” for want of a better word. No surprise that you’ve attracted the support of one of the forum’s chief deniers. There’s nothing to see here!