If you had fixed him then why didn't you sign him or play him at all last season? It doesn't add up.
Because we did not need him. He offered to play for us for FREE and Fergie told him to find another club.
If you had fixed him then why didn't you sign him or play him at all last season? It doesn't add up.
Because we did not need him. He offered to play for us for FREE and Fergie told him to find another club.
So is this why he is bitter?
Give me two weeks and he will be back injured, can i ask does anyone actually think he is that good. He only got credibility because he was a so called Englishman who played abroad. Is this not really the case..
robin_van_ fiberglass:1362476 said:Absolutly. You think city fixed him in three weeks? If anything the United medical staff fixed him.
If you had fixed him then why didn't you sign him or play him at all last season? It doesn't add up.
His problems were in his head. He was mentally weak. Sir Alex hinted at this on numerous occasions. Hargreaves himself admitted that he needed a change of scenery. Only an idiot would think that City have a medical staff who can solve a 3 year old injury in 3 weeks- or Owen Hargreaves himself, if we are to believe a word the snake says.
The fact that he was releasing videos to show his fitness and passed a lengthy medical suggests that the injury was gone before he saw Citys medical staff. If only if hadn't been so weak mentally, United may have seen the benefit of this.
TheRossi:1363367 said:This is amazing - are you all ****ing 8 years old? He was a guinea pig, in that the treatment they were using on him was experimental. Who was the last Man Utd player who had the same problems as Hargreaves? He's not saying they forced it on him or forced him to play, he's saying with hindsight it was the wrong option. He even admits that he agreed to play against Wolves and planned not to sprint! He's hardly ****ting on his ex.
I'm sure most fans on here originally wished him well, but one honest interview and he was '**** all along,' and 'wouldn't make the stating 11.'
Your club should be ashamed with how badly you treated this poor lad.![]()
If he felt like a test subject why did he hang around 3 fkn years![]()
This is amazing - are you all ****ing 8 years old? He was a guinea pig, in that the treatment they were using on him was experimental. Who was the last Man Utd player who had the same problems as Hargreaves? He's not saying they forced it on him or forced him to play, he's saying with hindsight it was the wrong option. He even admits that he agreed to play against Wolves and planned not to sprint! He's hardly ****ting on his ex.
Oh dear. Ye all need to take it for what it is.
He's endearing himself to City fans and he never had any ties with UNited fans anyway as he never played games.
It is just a little ironic that he goes to city and plays again and just happens to get a goal. It's a media stunt. PR bull****. If he felt like a test subject why did he hang around 3 fkn years
I mean c'mon, he's just gone from United to City, somethng had to be done to get in with the true blue fans eh?
Your club should be ashamed with how badly you treated this poor lad.![]()
I'm sorry mate, but you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Prolotherapy, the injection of a glucose solution into a tendon or ligament to stimulate new growth, has been clinically proven to have a greater than 80% success rate at treating ligament damage. And it has been used as a medical treatment since 1956. There was nothing "experimental" at all, Hargreaves just had a bad reaction to the injection, which happens with any treatment. It was his responsibility to familiarise himself with the risks before consenting to the injection. The rest was all down to him failing to recover properly from his injury.
As for the Wolves game, he admitted himself that he should have ruled himself out of the game, but he was too mentally fragile:
"âThere were 70,000 people there and if I had walked away from the game it would look like I didnât want to play. I thought, âIâll try and play, I just wonât sprintâ."
What did he expect was going to happen? That's possibly one of the most selfish things a sportsman can do - playing when you know you are not fit and won't be able to compete, just to make yourself look better.
Probably true, but I hoped for better than this from Hargo. He always seemed like a model professional rather than someone like Tevez, Clichy or Torres who would say anything and step on anyone just to make their new fans like them and build their own profile.
I didn't exactly mean the treatment was experimental in itself, but in relation to the particular injury it was. Someone has said Ferdinand had the se treatment, but his was on his back - not on a knee that Dr Steadman said was the 'worst I've ever seem'.
And by admitting he was planning to fake his way through the Wolves match he is putting the blame on himself. He admits he should have said no, but he didn't want to miss out. Hardly an attack on United.