Off Topic The Environmental & Pollution Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
davecg69 said:
So .... for the month of February (not exactly the sunniest month on record!) I have generated 163kwh from my panels and exported 25kwh to the grid. I don’t know yet what I’ve actually used as I didn’t keep a record of the meter when I changed suppliers (though I’m sure I could find it if I could be bothered to look!).
Not bad - I’m feeling rather smugly “green” today :emoticon-0103-cool:
Click to expand...
Dave, have you received any notifications from your energy supplier to help balance the grid? During storms Clara and Dennis, wind turbines were producing so much electricity that EV owners were asked to charge their cars and were paid a small amount too to help out. Of course, when stationary batteries are built much of this excess electricity will be stored until it becomes useful, which will stop an increasing number of peaker coal and gas power stations being brought online, and as more on/offshore wind turbines are commissioned.
 
TheSecondStain said:
Dave, have you received any notifications from your energy supplier to help balance the grid? During storms Clara and Dennis, wind turbines were producing so much electricity that EV owners were asked to charge their cars and were paid a small amount too to help out. Of course, when stationary batteries are built much of this excess electricity will be stored until it becomes useful, which will stop an increasing number of peaker coal and gas power stations being brought online, and as more on/offshore wind turbines are commissioned.
Click to expand...

I saw stuff about that, but I didn’t get any notification from my supplier (I should ask them) but, as the car was over on the IOW at the time, it was pretty well a moot point anyway ..... :emoticon-0105-wink:

Last night was the first time we charged “Marvin” (I didn’t name it <doh>) here ......
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSecondStain
Got one more interesting item. It's a covering for my quarterly Ramblers magazine made from potato starch instead of recyclable plastic. It feels exactly like plastic but you compost it. Or you can recycle it anyway, but not with the plastics. Or you could even send it to landfill, I suppose, because it breaks down super easily. This was a new one for me:

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: StJabbo1
Hat's off to an oil company. No, really. A fairly minor oil company Hunt Oil has seen the writing on the wall and has been developing Perovskite Solar Cells [think I mentioned them before]. They are cheaper, more efficient, simpler and cheaper to mass manufacture, and more environmentally friendly: https://cleantechnica.com/2020/02/2...olar-cell-company-bursts-out-of-stealth-mode/

It has long boggled me why oil companies haven't diversified into clean power yet. They have all the spare cash and research facilities they need, and the tide towards leaving the carbon in the ground is turning. So why not? BP and Shell own Rapid Charger networks, but this is moving towards producing clean power. That's fundamental.
 
Last edited:
Been waiting for this revelation. Plug-In hybrids [PHEVs] are not the environmentally friendly vehicles you might think they are. I have considered writing paragraphs on this topic before, but this Guardian fairly long article tells it well enough: https://www.theguardian.com/busines...ers-accused-of-con-over-zero-emissions-claims.

But put into its simplest terms, the batteries in PHEVs are more often than not, just not big enough. You can't draw sufficient power from them at any given moment to stop the ICE kicking in and sending all your mistakenly good intentions to the ****ter. Non-Plug-In hybrids [SCH] or Self-Charging Hybrids? Don't make me laugh Toyota and Subaru.
There are various reasons why manufacturers like to make PHEVs [and SCHs]. Here's two obvious ones: 1] They can put an existing, if modified ICE under the bonnet, and 2] They have sod-all quantity of batteries, because they've been caught with their pants down [I'm most definitely looking at Toyota again], so they put a tiny one inside the car with bugger all range and call it "green".
 
  • Like
Reactions: davecg69
TheSecondStain said:
Been waiting for this revelation. Plug-In hybrids [PHEVs] are not the environmentally friendly vehicles you might think they are. I have considered writing paragraphs on this topic before, but this Guardian fairly long article tells it well enough: https://www.theguardian.com/busines...ers-accused-of-con-over-zero-emissions-claims.

But put into its simplest terms, the batteries in PHEVs are more often than not, just not big enough. You can't draw sufficient power from them at any given moment to stop the ICE kicking in and sending all your mistakenly good intentions to the ****ter. Non-Plug-In hybrids [SCH] or Self-Charging Hybrids? Don't make me laugh Toyota and Subaru.
There are various reasons why manufacturers like to make PHEVs [and SCHs]. Here's two obvious ones: 1] They can put an existing, if modified ICE under the bonnet, and 2] They have sod-all quantity of batteries, because they've been caught with their pants down [I'm most definitely looking at Toyota again], so they put a tiny one inside the car with bugger all range and call it "green".
Click to expand...

Hallelulah! Well done, TSS and the Guardian. Heard yesterday that a PHEV owner was complaining that he charged overnight for a range of 20 miles! And they plug into a rapid charger for next to nothing. A tax incentive and a massive con.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSecondStain
In the paper, this morning, I saw two photos, taken by NASA over China.
One was taken in January and the other in February.
The first showed a massive cloud of pollution covering an enormous area.
The second one showed almost no pollution.
The improvement is believed to be due to factories not working and less traffic movement, as a result of the coronavirus.
Nature’s way of rebalancing the climate changes, caused by mankind?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StJabbo1, thereisonlyoneno7, Schrodinger's Cat and 3 others
St Badger said:
In the paper, this morning, I saw two photos, taken by NASA over China.
One was taken in January and the other in February.
The first showed a massive cloud of pollution covering an enormous area.
The second one showed almost no pollution.
The improvement is believed to be due to factories not working and less traffic movement, as a result of the coronavirus.
Nature’s way of rebalancing the climate changes, caused by mankind?
Click to expand...
Do you remember when they closed the airspace around New York City back after the 9/11 events? I believe it lasted for several days and the air quality improved tremendously. And that was just from aircraft of two decades ago. The ground traffic flowed as per normal. Of course, those pollutents and greenhouse gasses had to go somewhere. But a significant proportion broke down in reaction to sunlight. The CO2 and resultant H2O vapour took longer. The Earth can start to mend the situation for us if we give it a helping hand by just stopping being so dirty in our lifestyle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thereisonlyoneno7
davecg69 said:
Hallelulah! Well done, TSS and the Guardian. Heard yesterday that a PHEV owner was complaining that he charged overnight for a range of 20 miles! And they plug into a rapid charger for next to nothing. A tax incentive and a massive con.
Click to expand...
I'm sure we've all heard of that story which broke about 18 months back where companies had bought fleets of PHEVs on the tax incentive, and on selling them on, new owners had found that on-board battery charge cables were stilled sealed in bags and the batteries had never seen a raipd charger either. They been used as normal FFVs from the day they were new to the days they were sold on. Bloody ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davecg69
A really inspiring video to show how the vision of one man and his willingness to share it has helped his people. By using the meagre resources available he educated people to improve their food crop balance by using simple farming techniques. So simple and so brilliant.

I love stuff like this and it's people like Yacouba who are the real heroes of our planet. Enjoy .....


You must log in or register to see media
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheSecondStain, davecg69, ChilcoSaint and 1 other person
TheSecondStain said:
I'm sure we've all heard of that story which broke about 18 months back where companies had bought fleets of PHEVs on the tax incentive, and on selling them on, new owners had found that on-board battery charge cables were stilled sealed in bags and the batteries had never seen a raipd charger either. They been used as normal FFVs from the day they were new to the days they were sold on. Bloody ridiculous.
Click to expand...

My old employer was extremely keen to be seen to be “green” so encouraged (aided and abetted by HMRC) management to get PHEVs as company cars. So virtually all of them did ..... and I’d guarantee that not one was ever plugged in ..... :emoticon-0121-angry
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSecondStain
davecg69 said:
My old employer was extremely keen to be seen to be “green” so encouraged (aided and abetted by HMRC) management to get PHEVs as company cars. So virtually all of them did ..... and I’d guarantee that not one was ever plugged in ..... :emoticon-0121-angry
Click to expand...
What's even more ridiculous is that company vehicle running costs would have been lower if they had been used as PHEVs. <doh>
 
Was going to write a long post. But just watch the video. What it explains is a scenario involving a rape of Greta Thunberg. The scenario is utterly disgusting. I would say more, but just watch the video:

You must log in or register to see media

And Greta's response was utterly fantastic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back