**** that’s on the prem board isn’t it
**** that’s on the prem board isn’t it
Oh hell - we could be in for a beasting here
With a bit of luck they will all be in bed![]()
Don't worry mate, they are like tame kittens really You need to read more^^Thats the gayest two posts ever made on the Internet.

I said that earlier. My young friend @Libby told me he was a changed man. I haven’t read the exchange as I have been hosting and am pished.
I can only see if I shut one eye.Not read it all but seems to me that Fosse had a drink and started windmilling a bit after posters spent the entire weekend making sexually related posts about his teenage - and underage presumably - daughter.
From a quick look he certainly doesn't appear to have started it last night, being called a pervert before throwing insults out.
Not read it all but seems to me that Fosse had a drink and started windmilling a bit after posters spent the entire weekend making sexually related posts about his teenage - and underage presumably - daughter.
From a quick look he certainly doesn't appear to have started it last night, being called a pervert before throwing insults out.
good one Libby!Looks like a very nice bottle of plonk you were gifted last night mate.I can only see if I shut one eye.
I drank it. Reinforced my opinion that it’s easy to waste money on expensive wine.Looks like a very nice bottle of plonk you were gifted last night mate.
From a quick look he certainly doesn't appear to have started it last night, being called a pervert before throwing insults out.
Oh mateI drank it. Reinforced my opinion that it’s easy to waste money on expensive wine.

I think you need to go large to really appreciate a good wine. Anything mid range tends to disappoint. I definitely think that with champagne. A cheap champagne is invariably a waste of money. Get a decent Prosecco for half the price and it will be nicer. When my son was born my father in law gave me an expensive bottle of champagne. That was nice but it would have to be a very special occasion for me to spend that kind of cash on a drink.Oh mate![]()
How long did it take you to post that, from logging in to it appearing? It’s really annoying, innit?Well if you've been completely outwitted what have you got left? ... Go slow / Go brb ... same thing really ...
i ,and my guess is 99.99% of all other Reds , never even considered the possibility that there was an offside in the run up to their goal .Yeah, the Liverpool goal was legit.
So was the Wolves goal. Never offside, I don't care how they're interpreting the rules. It's a nonsense, and that was one of several perfectly good goals disallowed this weekend.

Looking through a lot of media (not just this forum) it's weird how many people saying
"Wolves goal should of stood because the spirit of the offside rule is about gaining a significant advantage and he was only a little bit offside"
are also saying
"doesn't matter that City gained a significant advantage from the ref winning them the ball because technically the rule only says if the ball physically touches him"
Mutton.Will you lads be holding a New Years Day Dinner competition, just asking for a friend![]()