**** that’s on the prem board isn’t it Oh hell - we could be in for a beasting here With a bit of luck they will all be in bed
Not read it all but seems to me that Fosse had a drink and started windmilling a bit after posters spent the entire weekend making sexually related posts about his teenage - and underage presumably - daughter. From a quick look he certainly doesn't appear to have started it last night, being called a pervert before throwing insults out.
Nah, he chose to make yet another pisstake homosexual jibe and I jokingly responded in kind, and he then did his usual, as he doesn’t do banter.
I think you need to go large to really appreciate a good wine. Anything mid range tends to disappoint. I definitely think that with champagne. A cheap champagne is invariably a waste of money. Get a decent Prosecco for half the price and it will be nicer. When my son was born my father in law gave me an expensive bottle of champagne. That was nice but it would have to be a very special occasion for me to spend that kind of cash on a drink.
Looking through a lot of media (not just this forum) it's weird how many people saying "Wolves goal should of stood because the spirit of the offside rule is about gaining a significant advantage and he was only a little bit offside" are also saying "doesn't matter that City gained a significant advantage from the ref winning them the ball because technically the rule only says if the ball physically touches him"
i ,and my guess is 99.99% of all other Reds , never even considered the possibility that there was an offside in the run up to their goal . I now feel quite smug about my pre season rants about how **** VAR will be
