Off Topic The Burly Arms

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
My son’s football matches are clashing with Woking home games but we made it for the last 30 minutes of the game against Halifax yesterday.

This was our conversation as we walked into the Kingfield.

Son: Are Halifax a big club as the name seems familiar?

Me: It's quite a new club but the old Halifax were in the football league a long time

Son: Maybe I'm thinking of the DIY shop

Me: You mean the bank?

Son: No, the DIY shop. Actually I'm thinking of Screwfix
 
When New Order are above Joy Division something isn't right.

Don't really agree with this, I see New Order as an evolved & improved Joy Division who, although clearly good, were quite limited.

They were young though so would have become better, as New Order clearly did, but Ian Curtis went and hanged himself!
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo
Most bands don’t exist without Beatles and/or Elvis either mind, or poetry, or Shakespeare or whatever, most of that is bollocks innit.

Wot? Beatles were shhite (not as independent artists) and like Elvis (the great pretender) manufactured to appeal to the masses. People couldn't even tell the difference between the Beatles and Klattu that's how fooked up it was, i can only assume the fans of the former were tone death <whistle>

The problem with the Beatles they got inbred into the music industry, that was the standard people had to 'aspire' too (Comm loves that word) - you couldn't fooking get away from it if you tried, it became repetitive and damn right fooking boring (The Beatles I mean).
 
Wot? Beatles were shhite (not as independent artists) and like Elvis (the great pretender) manufactured to appeal to the masses. People couldn't even tell the difference between the Beatles and Klattu that's how fooked up it was, i can only assume the fans of the former were tone death <whistle>

The problem with the Beatles they got inbred into the music industry, that was the standard people had to 'aspire' too (Comm loves that word) - you couldn't fooking get away from it if you tried, it became repetitive and damn right fooking boring (The Beatles I mean).

No I can’t stand either of the Beatles or Elvis but how far back do you go for who influenced who?
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
How did this ever end up with one of the most recognised bass lines...

You must log in or register to see media

Not worked it out, skip to 3.15
 
Don't really agree with this, I see New Order as an evolved & improved Joy Division who, although clearly good, were quite limited.

They were young though so would have become better, as New Order clearly did, but Ian Curtis went and hanged himself!
I like raw music, New Order were too polished for me. My favourite albums by bands tend to be the first albums on most occasions it's that time where the band are singing about life and it's struggles that speaks to me and a lot of bands can't recapture that once they have money and are famous.
 
No I can’t stand either of the Beatles or Elvis but how far back do you go for who influenced who?

What I mean is as a direct influence to musical style and impetus. Hence;

You must log in or register to see images





Other wise, yeah, all music is influenced in some way by all predecessors, one way or another, from however far back you want to go I suppose.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tel (they/them)
How far back for influences you ask...

You must log in or register to see media
 
How far back do influences go, name the song and famous artist who may have been influenced by this...

You must log in or register to see media
 
Last edited: