Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
According to an Ipsos mori survey taken in 16 different countries and based on online surveys of adults under 65 there was a tendency which suggests an unofficial boycott of British products after Brexit. The Italians were the most inclined to this at 43% from the sample, followed by the Spanish 37% and the Germans 33%. This is not to say that it is a conscious boycott just that if the same product is on offer from another EU country they will take it. British car exporters are noticing this trend already. As for visitors - how are you going to control those so called 'undesirables' coming in without also disadvantaging the millions of EU tourists who visit London every year ? Actually about 20 million people who come, spend their money, and then go - are they still going to come to a place which does not make them feel welcome ? No - they will choose Paris or somewhere else for their long weekend. Then there is the case of all those Americans, Japanese etc. who can come to London as part of a general European trip and just hop from one to the other. The consequences of Brexit could be catastrophic for London's tourist industry. As for the millions which the UK currently makes from language course tourism you can forget it - most of the language schools are already relocating to Ireland or Malta.

With respect mate, your comments on the tourist industry is utter rubbish. I’m willing to bet you £100 that in 5 years time, tourist visit figures will be the same or have increased from what they are now.
It just comes over as scaremongering.
 
Funnily enough I had to edit the text because of one spelling mistake - and in the meantime you had answered it. Nothing desrarate about this at all. Do the Tories have anything other than 'let's get it done' to sell to the electorate - if so could you enlighten me ? This appears rather thin to stand up to the scrutiny of a 6 week election campaign. Once we get away from the soundbites and headlines and start to look at real content then the present Tory lead will evaporate.

If the Labour Party we’re campaigning on the promise of more funding for schools and hospitals, plus increasing the number of rozzers, you’d be chugging a bucket of your own cum in excitement.

Or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
According to an Ipsos mori survey taken in 16 different countries and based on online surveys of adults under 65 there was a tendency which suggests an unofficial boycott of British products after Brexit. The Italians were the most inclined to this at 43% from the sample, followed by the Spanish 37% and the Germans 33%. This is not to say that it is a conscious boycott just that if the same product is on offer from another EU country they will take it. British car exporters are noticing this trend already. As for visitors - how are you going to control those so called 'undesirables' coming in without also disadvantaging the millions of EU tourists who visit London every year ? Actually about 20 million people who come, spend their money, and then go - are they still going to come to a place which does not make them feel welcome ? No - they will choose Paris or somewhere else for their long weekend. Then there is the case of all those Americans, Japanese etc. who can come to London as part of a general European trip and just hop from one to the other. The consequences of Brexit could be catastrophic for London's tourist industry. As for the millions which the UK currently makes from language course tourism you can forget it - most of the language schools are already relocating to Ireland or Malta.

I've heard of boycotts before relating to various nations. They never last.

Tourists will still come. They just won't be able to work and stay without a visa. London is a huge draw and will continue to be.

I haven't come across a worst fear mongerer than you, Cologne. Nothing personal!
 
With respect mate, your comments on the tourist industry is utter rubbish. I’m willing to bet you £100 that in 5 years time, tourist visit figures will be the same or have increased from what they are now.
It just comes over as scaremongering.
This is not just a case of scaremongering - at the point of entry you do not know who is a tourist and who is looking to stay and work - the former outnumber the latter by about 20 to one. How are you going to harden up the border for the one without disadvantaging the other ? How are you going to know the date of arrival of European incomers without insisting on passports which most EU citizens don't have. Currently a weekend tourist to London can make a spontaneous decision, buy a ticket, and go - with nothing other than an ID card, which all have by law. A majority don't have a passport, because they are not needed in the EU, and they are not going to go out and order one just for a weekend in London.
 
This is not just a case of scaremongering - at the point of entry you do not know who is a tourist and who is looking to stay and work - the former outnumber the latter by about 20 to one. How are you going to harden up the border for the one without disadvantaging the other ? How are you going to know the date of arrival of European incomers without insisting on passports which most EU citizens don't have. Currently a weekend tourist to London can make a spontaneous decision, buy a ticket, and go - with nothing other than an ID card, which all have by law. A majority don't have a passport, because they are not needed in the EU, and they are not going to go out and order one just for a weekend in London.
Unfortunately again you are wrong, to get into the U.K. you have to show a passport at the relevant border posts, you even have to show one to fly internally, this applies to U.K. citizens as well as EU citizens, again scaremongering at its finest.
And before you ask I am a driver who goes abroad , once regularly at least twice a week, now not so much, but even now I have to show my passport just to gain access to the ports I visit on a regular basis.
Again nothing more than scaremongering!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
This is not just a case of scaremongering - at the point of entry you do not know who is a tourist and who is looking to stay and work - the former outnumber the latter by about 20 to one. How are you going to harden up the border for the one without disadvantaging the other ? How are you going to know the date of arrival of European incomers without insisting on passports which most EU citizens don't have. Currently a weekend tourist to London can make a spontaneous decision, buy a ticket, and go - with nothing other than an ID card, which all have by law. A majority don't have a passport, because they are not needed in the EU, and they are not going to go out and order one just for a weekend in London.

I can honestly say in my 30 years of welcoming passengers into the UK at Heathrow, the vast majority of travellers had passports. Maybe the majority of Europeans don’t but I can only speak for the travellers I encountered.
Also from your previous post you inferred that it might also effect world tourism to this country.
Do you honestly feel that Earl and Freda from Kentucky are not gonna visit ‘cos of Brexit ?
Or the thousands of Japanese tourists who spend 24hrs in each city just to take a few photos as quickly as possible to prove they have been there are gonna knock London of their list ?
Of course they are not......it’s just scaremongering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
Scaremongering? Not famous Project Fear again so soon.

We’d better hope tourism doesn’t take a hit with Brexit costing us a cool 70 bill a year. There is of course the tourism boost of the pound being worth **** all to see us right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid
I've heard of boycotts before relating to various nations. They never last.

Tourists will still come. They just won't be able to work and stay without a visa. London is a huge draw and will continue to be.

I haven't come across a worst fear mongerer than you, Cologne. Nothing personal!
How do you issue a visa when most Europeans don't carry passports ? How do you decide at the point of entry who is a worker and who is a tourist ? This is not just a case of scaremongering Goldie - I hate Brexit and the reasoning behind it, and the way it has driven a wedge through my homeland - I would like to be able to be proud of my home nation living here, but I can't, I feel nothing but shame. I feel nothing but shame for a country where an internal problem of one small party of just over a hundred thousand members could lead to such far reaching consequences. Nothing but shame for a country where all true debate has been stifled for so long. Only shame for a country where prime ministers can close parliaments at will, be found guilty of it, yet carry on as if nothing has happened. At one time I thought Britain was a mature democracy - it has taken the last 3 years to destroy that belief. I can only say that I do not know another ex pat here who feels any different to me. Brexit has dragged Britain through the gutter in terms of it's standing in the World and it's difficult to live here and watch from a distance.
 
Scaremongering? Not famous Project Fear again so soon.

We’d better hope tourism doesn’t take a hit with Brexit costing us a cool 70 bill a year. There is of course the tourism boost of the pound being worth **** all to see us right.

I better hope I don’t get attacked by a mad axeman while out trick or treating tomorrow night.......project fear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
Unfortunately again you are wrong, to get into the U.K. you have to show a passport at the relevant border posts, you even have to show one to fly internally, this applies to U.K. citizens as well as EU citizens, again scaremongering at its finest.
And before you ask I am a driver who goes abroad , once regularly at least twice a week, now not so much, but even now I have to show my passport just to gain access to the ports I visit on a regular basis.
Again nothing more than scaremongering!!
Absolute rubbish ! I have been coming and going with my wife for the last 30 years and she has never needed to have a passport entering the UK - every citizen in the EU. carries an ID card and this is fully sufficient as a travel document.
 
This thread should seriously worry any Labour supporters, some detailed analysis...

You must log in or register to see media
I spoke to my Labour mate just 1 hour ago who thinks he is unelectable.
I believe there is a place in politics for Jezza just not leading the country.
 
Absolute rubbish ! I have been coming and going with my wife for the last 30 years and she has never needed to have a passport entering the UK - every citizen in the EU. carries an ID card and this is fully sufficient as a travel document.

Then how come every lorry driver, car driver, van driver, motorcyclist, pedestrian passenger has to show their ****ing passport before being allowed to go through “ PASSPORT CONTROL “ At Calais, boulogne, etc.
 
How do you issue a visa when most Europeans don't carry passports ? How do you decide at the point of entry who is a worker and who is a tourist ? This is not just a case of scaremongering Goldie - I hate Brexit and the reasoning behind it, and the way it has driven a wedge through my homeland - I would like to be able to be proud of my home nation living here, but I can't, I feel nothing but shame. I feel nothing but shame for a country where an internal problem of one small party of just over a hundred thousand members could lead to such far reaching consequences. Nothing but shame for a country where all true debate has been stifled for so long. Only shame for a country where prime ministers can close parliaments at will, be found guilty of it, yet carry on as if nothing has happened. At one time I thought Britain was a mature democracy - it has taken the last 3 years to destroy that belief. I can only say that I do not know another ex pat here who feels any different to me. Brexit has dragged Britain through the gutter in terms of it's standing in the World and it's difficult to live here and watch from a distance.

When you say "carry" do you mean 'own"? Don't most Europeans travel outside the EU? Don't they visit the US at some point. I get a visa to the US for pleasure or a short work visit. It doesn't mean I want to demand to stay their indefinitely.

It's easy to blame the Tories for Brexit, but it was a free vote, and 52% wanted to leave. Remainers say Leavers didn't know then, what they know now, but there is no evidence whatsoever that people have changed their minds. I'm proud that my country gave people the choice, and proud that the result will be honoured, and the electorate will not be told they made a mistake and to vote again, as has happened in some parts of Europe
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
Then how come every lorry driver, car driver, van driver, motorcyclist, pedestrian passenger has to show their ****ing passport before being allowed to go through “ PASSPORT CONTROL “ At Calais, boulogne, etc.
Possibly because all the British have to have them when travelling abroad, in absence of any other proof of ID.
 
I am certainly being optimistic Staines ! Though the fact remains that the Tories will be concentrating on a Brexit election, whereas Labour will be trying to broaden the debate and their success will depend on how well they do this. It is not a Brexit election where a party should be allowed to rule Britain for 5 years based on this alone - the people deserve more than that. People should realize that giving the Tories a majority means that Brexit will probably be dried and dusted in 3 months - but the flip side is that they would be living under the most right wing Tory administration ever for the remaining 4 and a half plus years. I hope that this is in people's minds when they go to the polls. It's also not just optimism to suggest that Labour will start doing better once the election campaign itself begins - this has happened at the last 2. The positive side of this is that they will now be forced to write down their Brexit policy in black and white - which involves getting off the fence. Potentially they have the majority on their side - the Tory choice of Boris's deal or a hard Brexit does not have a majority in the country - neither does the Lib/Dem policy of withdrawing Article 50 completely - both are extreme positions, whereas Labour is sitting in the middle ie. let the people decide. The only disadvantage to Labour's position is that it drags the Brexit process out longer - but it is worth going the extra mile on this.
I think that this statement goes a long way to showing a misunderstanding about leave supporters.

I believe that many leavers will lend their support to the Conservatives even if they fear an extreme government for a further four years rather than run the risk of Brexit not happening.

I, also, think that several of the ‘clever’ manoeuvres by Parliament over recent months could have serious repercussions if a more extreme government with a large majority get into power.

Some examples of perceived injustices:

Allowing the speaker to no longer need to be impartial
Rushing through laws in just a few hours (without proper scrutiny)
Allowing the public to realise that 11 judges are more powerful than Parliament and that the House of Lords can frustrate the government whenever they want to.

It is like a Pandora’s box that a lot have people have rejoiced in and I fear now that several extreme policies could be passed because of the perceived view that Parliament have been trying to stop ‘the will of the people’. Imagine if the government decided to hold a referendum on abolishing the House of Lords - I doubt if the majority would vote against it in the current climate.
 
I think that this statement goes a long way to showing a misunderstanding about leave supporters.

I believe that many leavers will lend their support to the Conservatives even if they fear an extreme government for a further four years rather than run the risk of Brexit not happening.

I, also, think that several of the ‘clever’ manoeuvres by Parliament over recent months could have serious repercussions if a more extreme government with a large majority get into power.

Some examples of perceived injustices:

Allowing the speaker to no longer need to be impartial
Rushing through laws in just a few hours (without proper scrutiny)
Allowing the public to realise that 11 judges are more powerful than Parliament and that the House of Lords can frustrate the government whenever they want to.

It is like a Pandora’s box that a lot have people have rejoiced in and I fear now that several extreme policies could be passed because of the perceived view that Parliament have been trying to stop ‘the will of the people’. Imagine if the government decided to hold a referendum on abolishing the House of Lords - I doubt if the majority would vote against it in the current climate.

I’m not sure they ever set out to do this but I have to hand it to the Tories for making the most of how ****ing thick our electorate has been and seems determined to be in future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid