Would you be happy if he didn't score again this season and we had to rely on others to score?
I said in an earlier post he works hard and plays well outside the box, in it, he's ****e
I cannot possibly disagree with that. And Eddie is the opposite!
But you were blaming Bamford for ALL of the shots. It's a disease the whole team has.
I've already posted on the issue as I see it:
* Eddie is an incomplete player. The bit that's lacking is the bit that Bamford does well. Very well.
* Costa is also an incomplete player. He has pace. He crosses well. Other than that, he's poor. Can't tackle, defends poorly, doesn't fit (but is improving!).
Both players are luxury players. With our style of play, we cannot accommodate 2 luxury players. We need at least 10 following the game plan 100%.
I think Bielsa's plan has been to go with Costa first, hoping he'd improve his on his deficiencies, before introducing Eddie, & rounding him. Good plan if you think about it, especially as Bamford was on fire to start with. However, Bamford has gone dry, & I may be wrong, but I've only seen Costa make one half-hearted tackle. The plan has gone a bit tits up, as both Bamford & Costa are not playing the full part that was expected of them by now.
The crisis point is now with us, or is not far away, imo. Bielsa has to decide what to do & has limited choices. Does he continue with Bamford & slot Eddie in somewhere, or does he drop Bamford & play Eddie instead? I think there's a wild card option - that Eddie will come in as the luxury player at Costa's expense, AND replace Bamford with Roberts. Kinda difficult to guess Bielsa though, isn't it?