Serious takeover talk

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Guinness Guzzler said:
It's on pure football on the smb if anyone is arsed, post number 324 on the "msd partners still at the table" thread. Be quick it'll be deleted soon.

Edit: gone already <laugh>

Edit edit its been quoted on post 328, that'll go soon as well
Click to expand...
ffs that went quick , read it mind
 
I was expecting a lot worse. Basically says that TD and his colleague ****ed up our stadium naming rights and that's a 5 year deal that the club is stuck with. Nothing specific about the takeover except for 'being greedy' which we could assume as a given for most people in negotiations with billionaires :D

As for the managerial stuff, it's entirely possible. They might have got it wrong to that degree and ended up getting their second choice on a longer deal because they'd messed Ainsworth and PP around, who knows.

Wouldn't say any of it was worth wetting the bed over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dorset and Sunderpitt
Kittenmittons said:
I was expecting a lot worse. Basically says that TD and his colleague ****ed up our stadium naming rights and that's a 5 year deal that the club is stuck with. Nothing specific about the takeover except for 'being greedy' which we could assume as a given for most people in negotiations with billionaires :D

As for the managerial stuff, it's entirely possible. They might have got it wrong to that degree, who knows.

Wouldn't say any of it was worth wetting the bed over.
Click to expand...

I think the bad part was naming names, also it insinuated that Davison ****ed things up when the bloke probably didn't (if he did then why has Parkinson suggested the investment is still possible). Don't see how it paints Donald in a bad light mind, he hardly gets a mention.

I also highly doubt we'd have gone to Ainsworth and even suggested a 6 month deal, no one would ever leave a club for that. The idea of then going to Parkinson, then back to Ainsworth, then suddenly accepting a Parkinson demand for 2.5 years also sounds like bollocks.

Reads very much like someone **** stirring and piecing together bits of rumours, the real question is who, and why. I know smug said he was traveling but I'm surprised he even gave it the time of day
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sid, DH4 and West Winger
Seen the text on RTG, if true I can see nothing SD (or whoever else they are slagging off) has done that is illegal, perhaps incompetent. Is this being spread about by GA? If so hell hath no fury like a (wo)man scorned. Very sceptical about the stuff in there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back