Off Topic Climate Strike

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So what? You might not have, millions of others did. This argument pops up all the time, but so what? If it was just you and Greta Thunberg living on the planet, you'd have a case, but you can't speak for everybody else your age on this planet.

You didn't have lifts to school, but trains and cars were ten times more environmentally damaging than they are now and plenty of people drove them. I don't know how old you are, but guessing by your attitude, I'd wager you were born before the 1980s.

So tell me what DELIBERATE efforts were made to prevent environmental disaster during your formative years?

Every generation above hers, mine included, is at fault. You don't get a free pass because you didn't buy a ****ing Big Mac in the 70s.

Generally people and governments do what they think is right at that time, I can just remember steam trains giving way to diesel and later the introduction of electric ones. When i was a kid every house had an open fire, over time smokeless zones were introduced and later all council houses went onto gas or electric. Remember when most cars ran on leaded petrol, first the switch to unleaded and the onto diesel. To suggest all these things and others were not pre planned things to better the planet and people living on it is a bit nieve to say the least.

As knowledge and technology move forward we learn more and hope to improve things. Sometime the experts get it wrong, before my time but cigarettes were advertised as good for your health, recommended by Doktors. Plastic was a great thing with many benefits when it was first invented, now its use and more importantly how people dispose of it has become a huge problem. Who knows what we will discover in the coming years, are mobile phones bad for the brain? will the kids of today and their kids evolve and start to be born with hand defects because of constant use of mobile devices? Who knows what things we are doing today will turn out to be bad for the planet and its inhabitants?
 
Hey, you're right, she's 16. Surely it's her job to ohwaitnoitisn't.

Another strawman.

She isn't the one that needs to come up with a solution, that would be the people in charge of the nations causing these problems. She's not a scientist or a climatologist, she's just an empowered kid on a mission to raise awareness.

I don't think she's ever once suggested she could solve it, but then, she doesn't need to. Since when was raising awareness the same as solving the problem?

This whole thread is so full of strawmen it's a wonder some oiks haven't tied up Humberside Fire and Rescue for the duration. People either understand the science and the implications or they don't (or won't) believe it because they don't want to change. There's no point blaming generations, we've known about the effects of changing our atmosphere since the mid 19th century and others are only just learning about it the hard way. Europe **** it's pants when 2 million Syrian refugees rocked up, **** knows what they're gonna do when 2 billion climate refugees, desperate for water and food, start turning up on our 'I've got mine, **** you' doormat.
 
This whole thread is so full of strawmen it's a wonder some oiks haven't tied up Humberside Fire and Rescue for the duration. People either understand the science and the implications or they don't (or won't) believe it because they don't want to change. There's no point blaming generations, we've known about the effects of changing our atmosphere since the mid 19th century and others are only just learning about it the hard way. Europe **** it's pants when 2 million Syrian refugees rocked up, **** knows what they're gonna do when 2 billion climate refugees, desperate for water and food, start turning up on our 'I've got mine, **** you' doormat.

Aye, teaching standards have slumped.
 
Aye, teaching standards have slumped.

*Had slumped

We teach about climate every year in our school in one subject or another. The current generation are pretty clued in, which is probably why they're taking it seriously. I wish we'd been taught better, though.
 
*Had slumped

We teach about climate every year in our school in one subject or another. The current generation are pretty clued in, which is probably why they're taking it seriously. I wish we'd been taught better, though.

Nope, I'll stick with 'have'. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steven Toast
*Had slumped

We teach about climate every year in our school in one subject or another. The current generation are pretty clued in, which is probably why they're taking it seriously. I wish we'd been taught better, though.

Our generation protested against the use of CFCs. Now they're banned and the damage is almost repaired.
 
Generally people and governments do what they think is right at that time, I can just remember steam trains giving way to diesel and later the introduction of electric ones. When i was a kid every house had an open fire, over time smokeless zones were introduced and later all council houses went onto gas or electric. Remember when most cars ran on leaded petrol, first the switch to unleaded and the onto diesel. To suggest all these things and others were not pre planned things to better the planet and people living on it is a bit nieve to say the least.

As knowledge and technology move forward we learn more and hope to improve things. Sometime the experts get it wrong, before my time but cigarettes were advertised as good for your health, recommended by Doktors. Plastic was a great thing with many benefits when it was first invented, now its use and more importantly how people dispose of it has become a huge problem. Who knows what we will discover in the coming years, are mobile phones bad for the brain? will the kids of today and their kids evolve and start to be born with hand defects because of constant use of mobile devices? Who knows what things we are doing today will turn out to be bad for the planet and its inhabitants?

We don't, but as you said, we have better science now and we realise that the impact of climate change is already being felt. Before, it was a doomsday prediction but now we're actually seeing it in action. However, we knew that burning fossil fuels released noxious gases and that those gases had to go into the atmosphere, it wasn't as though we thought they dissipated into nothing. CFCs were a big problem when I was growing up and thankfully now most fridges use different systems.

There'll be a tonne of stuff we do now that isn't good for us, but the difference now is we can spot it and act on it much quicker than our predecessors could.
 
Our generation protested against the use of CFCs. Now they're banned and the damage is almost repaired.

Well we're on the same wavelength then. But that, coupled with the switch to unleaded fuel should have been the catalyst for green energy, but it wasn't.

In any event, I suppose the past is irrelevant now, so I was wrong to bring it up, but it's no excuse now given the awareness people have.

If people get annoyed by Greta Thunburg, good. Great, even. People don't have to like her, just listen to what she's saying and help push those in power to act upon it. And if people end up making a small change, she's done her job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Des Head
So what? You might not have, millions of others did. This argument pops up all the time, but so what? If it was just you and Greta Thunberg living on the planet, you'd have a case, but you can't speak for everybody else your age on this planet.

You didn't have lifts to school, but trains and cars were ten times more environmentally damaging than they are now and plenty of people drove them. I don't know how old you are, but guessing by your attitude, I'd wager you were born before the 1980s.

So tell me what DELIBERATE efforts were made to prevent environmental disaster during your formative years?

Every generation above hers, mine included, is at fault. You don't get a free pass because you didn't buy a ****ing Big Mac in the 70s.

Your last sentence suggests reasonable debate isn't part of your make up.I was born in the year of the bay of pigs invasion,in my days it was polite to respect your elders and swearing in correspondence was a big no-no!!!(how things have went downhill since).

I lived in a house where if you were the youngest you got the dirtiest bathwater,you took old clothes out to the ragman,your Dad took his beer bottles back to the pub and on a Saturday you could take your saved up newspapers to the chippy and you were rewarded with a bag of scraps.

As for 'toast'....we did that on an open coal fire in the only heated room in the house and thanked the Lord that we had received it!!!

Big Macs....No thanks.
 
Well we're on the same wavelength then. But that, coupled with the switch to unleaded fuel should have been the catalyst for green energy, but it wasn't.

In any event, I suppose the past is irrelevant now, so I was wrong to bring it up, but it's no excuse now given the awareness people have.

If people get annoyed by Greta Thunburg, good. Great, even. People don't have to like her, just listen to what she's saying and help push those in power to act upon it. And if people end up making a small change, she's done her job.

I absolutely agree. I didn't know anything about her apart from a brief mention in the news until this thread. She's not trying to teach generations before hers, she's trying to inform her own, because we can't afford another generation like those that have gone before.
 
Well we're on the same wavelength then. But that, coupled with the switch to unleaded fuel should have been the catalyst for green energy, but it wasn't.

In any event, I suppose the past is irrelevant now, so I was wrong to bring it up, but it's no excuse now given the awareness people have.

If people get annoyed by Greta Thunburg, good. Great, even. People don't have to like her, just listen to what she's saying and help push those in power to act upon it. And if people end up making a small change, she's done her job.

You're missing quite a chunk with that version, such as the media involvement, as well as the work done by many that came before. Some seem to get a feel good sensation by talking about her as if she's Mother Teresa and assuming anyone that strays from the media driven version must be ignorant of the facts and someone to be preached at.

I pointed out some of the implications, and I've yet to see any meaningful reply on here.
 
You're missing quite a chunk with that version, such as the media involvement, as well as the work done by many that came before. Some seem to get a feel good sensation by talking about her as if she's Mother Teresa and assuming anyone that strays from the media driven version must be ignorant of the facts and someone to be preached at.

I pointed out some of the implications, and I've yet to see any meaningful reply on here.

Forget Greta, focus on the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stockholm Tiger