Correct, well saidThe Allams have willingly set out to hurt Hull City fans and now the Parachute money has gone, they want us to help them out.
I say 'Get ****ed'.
Correct, well saidThe Allams have willingly set out to hurt Hull City fans and now the Parachute money has gone, they want us to help them out.
I say 'Get ****ed'.
THE OTHERS WERE RELATIVELY EASY TO GET RID OF! That's a good reason very easy to understand answer to your question. When that wasn't enough for you, I referred you to good posts by Ulrika and Barchullona. I'll say again, what is it you don't understand, Mr Howdentiger2?
Back in Martin Fish's day I didn't concern myself with the politics of football. I was just a football fan, watching my team, so Iv'e got nothing to remember on that, or very little anyway. The football was dire, but I was used to that and actully didn't mind. It was all about being there for me. The atmosphere was actually fantastic to me. I loved match day. I saw Waggy, Chiltern, Butler and the rest, but I have a very vague memory of that. I only know I saw the 'Clock stand' because my Dad told me I did. My memory probably isn't helped, by the fact I'd spend most of them games staring at someones back with my bottom lip out
The Lloyd days. I did get involved. Joining Tigers CO-OP, (Iv'e still got my membership card) and going to meetings at 147 on Spring bank. Going well into my over draught to pay the fees for My Dad and brother-in-law (They never did pay me back). But yeah, I still attended because I felt very much a part of it.
The Allams have willingly set out to hurt Hull City fans and now the Parachute money has gone, they want us to help them out.
I say 'Get ****ed'.
Hope this helps, Sir.
Sorry, this is in reply to HT2.I was only trying to save myself some typing. You got me in the end![]()
How did you feel that connection??One reason could be that with previous owners you were stood with 3,000 or so like minded souls watching the direst football imaginable and despite it all still felt a connection to what you still regarded as your club. The Allams removed that feeling from a lot of long time fans.
How did you feel that connection??
I lived in Hull and was a (youth) season ticket holder from 1967-72 then left to go to Uni. I remember the "other **** owners" whilst living in Leicester, Norwich and Salisbury, attending games when I could, some away and home games when I came back to see my family. My memory of these owners was that they wanted a big crowd and tried to encourage fans to attend. They may have been robbing the club blind but did not seem (in my opinion) to hold the supporters in contempt, as they understood that bums on seats increased revenue. The Allams, however, seem (again in my opinion) to hold everyone in contempt, and (until now when the parachute payments have gone) go out of their way to demonstrate it. Unsurprisingly, they have alienated many. Football is an entertainment industry. If people dont get a feel good factor then they wont attend. It takes a long time to foster this feel good factor if the team is not particularly setting the world on fire. Adam Pearson knew this and so did Don Robinson. Both achieved much merely with their attitude to the fans and entertaining them. The Allams have demonstrated (to me) that they hold the like of me in contempt. Unsurprisingly, I hold them in contempt back. I don't think there is a way back. Sorry to be so long-winded.

So, we are not really so far apart.
I only offered an opinion, not a directive. Agreeing, or not, would be better served provoking discussion, rather than the usual vitriol and rather tired cliques that still spoil this board. Maybe cliques is too organised a term, but we see it.
You summed up the Allams quite adequately, so why, now we have spent the time giving, bending and generally being nice guys, do we still use them as a reason not to support our club? Especially if supporting our club is what we want to do. Play with symantics, but deal with what is available.
Gradually they are winning their fight against supporters. Think about it.
They, the owners, are the reason people like me don’t go & will therefore always be to blame for my current decision not to attend.
Do you not understand that principle?
If people stopped attending, as their own personal point of principle, because the owners, had created an environment that meant you couldn’t believe or trust them. Also you believed, quite strongly, that they had got away with so much that they shouldn’t have. Add to that many other reasons including feeling strongly that the removal of concessions is a piss take & the name change application is a piss take which will last forever along with believing that any decision reversals are carried out with a false largesse. Then you’d have good reason to blame them for having to miss out on attending games because your personal principles don’t allow you to.
It doesn’t stop there though. If you also think they treat you, as a customer like ****e, abuse goodwill and are as disingenuous a pair as you will ever meet. That they pretend to listen & claim to work with the fans but in reality you think they’re not. You see them as having lost any moral high ground they could ever hold. As a supporter you feel strongly that their actions are damaging the club, as do many other supporters & non supporters. They’re the enemy in all of this, sometimes forgotten. Then you have a good argument & reason to uphold your personal point of principle.
If supporters have stopped attending because they feel the club has been infected by the disease of our current owners who you genuinely believe to be worse than most other owners then your personal principle surely won’t allow you to attend especially if you already choose not to put a single penny into the Allam coffers while they progresses their campaign against the club. Remember reversals are false sentiment & their personal characteristics are the same as they have always been.
If you consider all of the above to be true & have made a personal commitment not to return until the current owners have gone then surely they are to blame & will always be to blame for a personal point of principle. In fact anybody who has made that commitment would never go back on their personal principle just because they have made a couple of false concessions?
They certainly wouldn’t announce that the owners they no longer blame for their non attendance.
The owners are not beating me, they’ve never even come close.
Great post,Sir BenThey, the owners, are the reason people like me don’t go & will therefore always be to blame for my current decision not to attend.
Do you not understand that principle?
If people stopped attending, as their own personal point of principle, because the owners, had created an environment that meant you couldn’t believe or trust them. Also you believed, quite strongly, that they had got away with so much that they shouldn’t have. Add to that many other reasons including feeling strongly that the removal of concessions is a piss take & the name change application is a piss take which will last forever along with believing that any decision reversals are carried out with a false largesse. Then you’d have good reason to blame them for having to miss out on attending games because your personal principles don’t allow you to.
It doesn’t stop there though. If you also think they treat you, as a customer like ****e, abuse goodwill and are as disingenuous a pair as you will ever meet. That they pretend to listen & claim to work with the fans but in reality you think they’re not. You see them as having lost any moral high ground they could ever hold. As a supporter you feel strongly that their actions are damaging the club, as do many other supporters & non supporters. They’re the enemy in all of this, sometimes forgotten. Then you have a good argument & reason to uphold your personal point of principle.
If supporters have stopped attending because they feel the club has been infected by the disease of our current owners who you genuinely believe to be worse than most other owners then your personal principle surely won’t allow you to attend especially if you already choose not to put a single penny into the Allam coffers while they progresses their campaign against the club. Remember reversals are false sentiment & their personal characteristics are the same as they have always been.
If you consider all of the above to be true & have made a personal commitment not to return until the current owners have gone then surely they are to blame & will always be to blame for a personal point of principle. In fact anybody who has made that commitment would never go back on their personal principle just because they have made a couple of false concessions?
They certainly wouldn’t announce that the owners are no longer to blame for their non attendance.
The owners are not beating me, they’ve never even come close.




Just seen Sjoke v vermin on Quest, that fearsome cauldron {insert betting sponsor name here} Stadium looked half empty.
Are they angry with their owner too, or just doing **** in the second tier so fans have drifted away?
It was actually 80% full and only 10% down on their Premier League attendances, so really quite impressive.
If you watched the whole game, there was a mass exodus after Leeds scored their third.Lots of empty seats on view.
Perhaps someone is declaring a bogus attendance?
These things do happen.
They, the owners, are the reason people like me don’t go & will therefore always be to blame for my current decision not to attend.
Do you not understand that principle?
If people stopped attending, as their own personal point of principle, because the owners, had created an environment that meant you couldn’t believe or trust them. Also you believed, quite strongly, that they had got away with so much that they shouldn’t have. Add to that many other reasons including feeling strongly that the removal of concessions is a piss take & the name change application is a piss take which will last forever along with believing that any decision reversals are carried out with a false largesse. Then you’d have good reason to blame them for having to miss out on attending games because your personal principles don’t allow you to.
It doesn’t stop there though. If you also think they treat you, as a customer like ****e, abuse goodwill and are as disingenuous a pair as you will ever meet. That they pretend to listen & claim to work with the fans but in reality you think they’re not. You see them as having lost any moral high ground they could ever hold. As a supporter you feel strongly that their actions are damaging the club, as do many other supporters & non supporters. They’re the enemy in all of this, sometimes forgotten. Then you have a good argument & reason to uphold your personal point of principle.
If supporters have stopped attending because they feel the club has been infected by the disease of our current owners who you genuinely believe to be worse than most other owners then your personal principle surely won’t allow you to attend especially if you already choose not to put a single penny into the Allam coffers while they progresses their campaign against the club. Remember reversals are false sentiment & their personal characteristics are the same as they have always been.
If you consider all of the above to be true & have made a personal commitment not to return until the current owners have gone then surely they are to blame & will always be to blame for a personal point of principle. In fact anybody who has made that commitment would never go back on their personal principle just because they have made a couple of false concessions?
They certainly wouldn’t announce that the owners are no longer to blame for their non attendance.
The owners are not beating me, they’ve never even come close.
If you watched the whole game, there was a mass exodus after Leeds scored their third.
Highlights probably were selectively edited ?
All true.Just saw 'highlights'
That club went uo with us in 2008 and were constantly held up as the loudest fans in the league, the passionate Potteries and many on here compared us unfavourably with them.
You rarely saw an empty seat at their home games and their owner laid on free transport for free to away games in recent PL seasons.
Ain't no substitute for a winning team
Just saw 'highlights'
That club went uo with us in 2008 and were constantly held up as the loudest fans in the league, the passionate Potteries and many on here compared us unfavourably with them.
You rarely saw an empty seat at their home games and their owner laid on free transport for free to away games in recent PL seasons.
Ain't no substitute for a winning team
I'm sorry you have chosen not to go. But the price for adults was ridiculously low previously.There are many reasons why our attendances are down. One of those is people refusing to give money to the Allams. Another cost, another is being shunted from one stand to another and back, another is its no longer very enjoyable and another is we're a lower to mid-table championship team with no prospect of investment under the Allams. No doubt there are other reasons. All are signs of Allams failure to properly manage our club.
The Premier League money running out is no reason to attend if you hate the Allams so much you haven't given them a penny previously.
Tomorrow will be our last game as "pass holders" as we've given up our memberships. The main reason is the cost of our membership nearly doubled and I'm on a fixed income. A secondary reason is that under the Allams we have moved three times, two of which were forced. Being treated like cattle made the decision to stop our membership easier. We still intend to come to some matches at the KCOM, maybe an away match or two, or we could go and see Filey at Scarborough if another trip is organised.
If nothing changes in terms of pricing we'll reconsider when I become eligible for the OAP concession. In the meantime we'll pick and choose which games we come to.