Club watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
SpursDisciple said:
<ok> So that would mean we are ok for PL, but that wouldn't help with CL. I guess that is bad news for GKN or Wanyama (or, god forbid, Eriksen).

Also not sure where Llorente would fit in without outgoings.
Click to expand...
No he can go on list B for the CL as he has been with us for 2 years. That wasn't the case before.
Sessegnon counts as U21 in the PL but not in the CL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpursDisciple
SpursDisciple said:
<ok> So that would mean we are ok for PL, but that wouldn't help with CL. I guess that is bad news for GKN or Wanyama (or, god forbid, Eriksen).

Also not sure where Llorente would fit in without outgoings.
Click to expand...
Also Georghiu is not U-21 so has to be registered. As far as I can see he hasn't been so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpursDisciple
So this is our squad, subject to any European Outgoings

You must log in or register to see images
 
humanbeingincroydon said:
My main takeaway from this is that there's a lot of tax-dodgers sponsoring Premier League clubs

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
Leaving aside the massive gap between the top six and everyone else, you'd have to question Wolves and Brighton.
The former for being unusually large for a promoted club with dodgy owners and the latter for being unusually low.
Does it fail to include the stadium sponsorship or are they just getting a **** deal?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Leaving aside the massive gap between the top six and everyone else, you'd have to question Wolves and Brighton.
The former for being unusually large for a promoted club with dodgy owners and the latter for being unusually low.
Does it fail to include the stadium sponsorship or are they just getting a **** deal?
Click to expand...
In Brighton's case it's definitely tied to the naming rights of their stadium, considering how low the figure is for Leicester as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
I think the club were so desperate to get their own ground by then that and were were only a Championship side that it was the best they could get. Basically, stadium naming rights with shirt sponsor thrown bin for free.

Anyway, American Express are the biggest employer bin the city (but still very small). It's a city of small businesses and service industry. People think it is a rich place ( along with the rest of the South East) but jobs are poorly paid and transport links suck. Wealth is mostly from people who retire down this way while those who work struggle to live with ridiculous property prices and rents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Changing Man, Spurf and PleaseNotPoll
NotSoMightyEastbourneBoro said:
I think the club were so desperate to get their own ground by then that and were were only a Championship side that it was the best they could get. Basically, stadium naming rights with shirt sponsor thrown bin for free.

Anyway, American Express are the biggest employer bin the city (but still very small). It's a city of small businesses and service industry. People think it is a rich place ( along with the rest of the South East) but jobs are poorly paid and transport links suck. Wealth is mostly from people who retire down this way while those who work struggle to live with ridiculous property prices and rents.
Click to expand...
<confused>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back