not 606

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
My take on this is, as you know I love the craic.

What is getting ridiculous is certain Mags entering threads that have nothing to do with them , clearly just to disrupt any sensible debate.
Disruption isn't WUMming, lets be honest their actual attempts at WUMming have been feeble.
If they have something to add on the subject fine!

If it's a thread mentioning Newcastle fine get in and let rip! <ok>

Disrupting a legitimate thread, is childish and tedious, making an inane comment isn't big or clever it just makes you look stupid.

The Troll seems to spend more time here than on his own board do he and the Skunk in the corner not have anyone to talk to on their own board?
 
I'm sick of hearing about the "great Mags come-back"! It was construcred by the officials for crying out loud...If all was fair, Newcastle should have been down to nine men, as both were worse than the Arsenal red card; and don't get me started on the penalty decisions!!!
Both Sunderland and Arsenal lost points yesterday down to shocking decisions, and this makes me very bitter....
As for the original question in this thread, these sites would be nothing without the banter between supporters, and I'm afraid that idiots from both sides just have to shot down or put up with, but not deleted unless they are sexist, racist or thretening... That's my view anyway...
 
Just had an hour on the mags site, never published anything though, was looking for sitnext to a badgers contributions today,
only found two,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, TWO, and one was mocking Andy Carrolls supposed demise, Our site must be much more rewarding.
Maybe he WILL defect?