Transfer Rumours Summer transfer rumour thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PleaseNotPoll said:
That's not an option to buy. They might want to sell him to you next year, if they decide that he's ****. Brilliant. <ok>
Click to expand...

Not in the loan deal, but still a potential transfer should Real madrid agree to sell. It depends on lots of factors, if Ceballos has a good season at Arsenal and settles in London he could decide that he wants to stay. We all know that Real will spend a **** ton of cash between now and then too, and may well just buy another player in his position anyway.

A similar thing happened with Kovacic at Chelsea. He was loaned from Real without an option to buy, but then Chelsea bought him the following summer anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
PISKIE said:
Not in the loan deal, but still a potential transfer should Real madrid agree to sell. It depends on lots of factors, if Ceballos has a good season at Arsenal and settles in London he could decide that he wants to stay. We all know that Real will spend a **** ton of cash between now and then too, and may well just buy another player in his position anyway.

A similar thing happened with Kovacic at Chelsea. He was loaned from Real without an option to buy, but then Chelsea bought him the following summer anyway.
Click to expand...
By that logic every team in the world has an option to buy him.

As I said before, you're putting yourselves in a poor position and the deal is extremely one-sided.
Your manager has agreed to play him a lot and if it works out well, then his value inflates dramatically.
If it doesn't work, then you've wasted a year training up a Real Madrid player.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
By that logic every team in the world has an option to buy him.

As I said before, you're putting yourselves in a poor position and the deal is extremely one-sided.
Your manager has agreed to play him a lot and if it works out well, then his value inflates dramatically.
If it doesn't work, then you've wasted a year training up a Real Madrid player.
Click to expand...

As with Kovacic, Real have agreed to discuss a transfer with us next summer. So if he has a good season, we potentially get the option to buy him, if he doesn't we send him back. Obviously an option to buy in the loan deal would have been preferable. But this deal suits us, we need MF reinforcements and we don't have to lay out any transfer money this summer.
 
PISKIE said:
As with Kovacic, Real have agreed to discuss a transfer with us next summer. So if he has a good season, we potentially get the option to buy him, if he doesn't we send him back. Obviously an option to buy in the loan deal would have been preferable. But this deal suits us, we need MF reinforcements and we don't have to lay out any transfer money this summer.
Click to expand...
And Chelsea got ****ed on the Kovacic fee, but they don't care because they can afford it and they can't sign anyone else.
You can't afford it. You've agreed to a **** deal that Spurs wouldn't and you're claiming it as a victory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bald Archie and Dier Hard
PleaseNotPoll said:
And Chelsea got ****ed on the Kovacic fee, but they don't care because they can afford it and they can't sign anyone else.
You can't afford it. You've agreed to a **** deal that Spurs wouldn't and you're claiming it as a victory.
Click to expand...

<laugh> Calm down. I said it was a decent deal for us as we get MF reinforcement and we don't have to pay any transfer deal this summer.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
By that logic every team in the world has an option to buy him.

As I said before, you're putting yourselves in a poor position and the deal is extremely one-sided.
Your manager has agreed to play him a lot and if it works out well, then his value inflates dramatically.
If it doesn't work, then you've wasted a year training up a Real Madrid player.[/QUOTE]

Being serious now.

First part is a good argument.

Not sure that is a good argument. If hes ****, youh wasted a year (if he was bought you would also have wasted a year) you have saved yourself money on the purchase price as you have paid f all compared a permanent buy.

Overall though agree, its better to have bought permanently or a loan with option to buy
Click to expand...
 
PISKIE said:
Accoring to Sky, there may be an option to buy him next summer

'Despite the lack of a buyout clause, Real Madrid have promised Arsenal that they will re-evaluate their position next summer and potentially discuss a permanent transfer then, according to Sky Italy journalist Fabrizio Romano.'
/
Click to expand...

Literally, mate, just listen to yourself!
<laugh>

It’s as desperate as it gets.
 
Reports saying we are favourites to sign Dennis Praet, another Belgian midfielder, from Sampdoria ... straight fight between us and AC Milan coz the Goons have now dropped out coz them ain't got no money <whistle>
 
Last edited:
FosseFilberto said:
Reports saying we are favourites to sign Dennis Praet, another Belgian midfielder, from Sampdoria ... straight fight between us Abmnd AC Milan coz the Goons have now dropped out coz them ain't got no money <whistle>
Click to expand...

BAM! BAM!

double tap from Bambs.

Pixie is having a mare.
 
PISKIE said:
Not in the loan deal, but still a potential transfer should Real madrid agree to sell. It depends on lots of factors, if Ceballos has a good season at Arsenal and settles in London he could decide that he wants to stay. We all know that Real will spend a **** ton of cash between now and then too, and may well just buy another player in his position anyway.

A similar thing happened with Kovacic at Chelsea. He was loaned from Real without an option to buy, but then Chelsea bought him the following summer anyway.
Click to expand...

Kovacic must have had an option to buy, otherwise Chelsea have just broken their transfer embargo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skylarker and Libby
Tel said:
Kovacic must have had an option to buy, otherwise Chelsea have just broken their transfer embargo.
Click to expand...

Im not sure if it was. I read somewhere embargo stops us registering players not buying players. **** knows how that worked with pulisic?

Didnt barca buy a load of players when they were embargoed but couldnt sign then up? (Think it was vidal the right back and turan)
 
BobbyD said:
Im not sure if it was. I read somewhere embargo stops us registering players not buying players. **** knows how that worked with pulisic?

Didnt barca buy a load of players when they were embargoed but couldnt sign then up? (Think it was vidal the right back and turan)
Click to expand...

Pulisic was already your player before you were banned from making signings. Kovacic was registered as a Chelsea player so you could extend his stay by activating a buy-out clause.
 
Bobby right now...

You must log in or register to see images
 

Attachments

  • d3bb91034593e113de210b2127c649a0.gif
    d3bb91034593e113de210b2127c649a0.gif
    1.7 MB · Views: 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back