-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I bet there's a fck of a lot more in matrimonial! I once lost a house because the bitch took the sale all the way to exchange of contracts then pulled out just to fck off her ex-husband!
I burnt her house down
I steered clear of matrimonial to be honest. I worked in the family courts for the past 8 months of my working in law and it basically finished me. It was all child custody issues (mostly we represented the child) and it was often situations that kept me awake at nights and ruined my weekends. I quit at 28 and don't regret it, can honestly say I'm a much happier person now.
But i do need sleep. Night all.
easily that long mate, long time
sorry to spill the beans about you, but piskie was losing it, and needs a good dodgy lawyer.
I knew it was a water tight case. I just needed a real Lawyer to put their stamp of approval on it as Kipper was doing his best to welch.
Sad state of affairs, seems to bring the irrational out in people.
Goodnight mate
Some people can be very unsentimental when it comes to money. They will **** over their loved ones and kids over it. Shame, but that's what this **** does to some people.
@Hoddle Is A God
have you read the legal opinion that has been expressed on this thread, and if you have did you understand it or do you need someone to help explain the long sentences and big words.
Basically my bet terms are the ones that both parties have agreed to.
So what avatar shall I give Hiag - guys can you make some suggestions
have you read the legal opinion that has been expressed on this thread, and if you have did you understand it or do you need someone to help explain the long sentences and big words.
Basically my bet terms are the ones that both parties have agreed to.
So what avatar shall I give Hiag - guys can you make some suggestions
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
@Hoddle Is A God
have you read the legal opinion that has been expressed on this thread, and if you have did you understand it or do you need someone to help explain the long sentences and big words.
Basically my bet terms are the ones that both parties have agreed to.
So what avatar shall I give Hiag - guys can you make some suggestions
If you are going to Welch our wager, there is nothing I can do about that, but you will forever be known as a welcher.
It is down to you.
The lads have consulted with a real lawyer mate and the conclusion is that G4E’s amended terms stand because you agreed to them.
It has also been concluded that you should have raised any issues with those terms at the time.
Your ignorance isn’t a defence.
It is you that is trying to get out of our agreed wager, which makes you the welcher.
You have a history of welching bets, and I have always honoured mine, so we all know who is in the wrong.
Man up and grow a pair, the avatar will just poke fun at you for losing and it won’t have Sol in it - my word on that
I think we should have a signature bet on it. 6 months from the end of next season, anything goes.
You got the stones for that Kips ?
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
I'm sorely tempted, Pix.
But, I am going to be strong and resist that temptation.
I want to clear all existing bets, first, mate. You know that, as I have had to repeat it for you several times, now.
That Emery / Poch one can still stand as it's an avatar bet and won't interfere with this one as it's a signature bet mate.
If Wolves finish above us next season you get to choose my Signature for 6 months, and be as brutal as you like. If Arsenal finish above Wolves I get to choose yours.
So let's see if you've got the stones ?
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
As I said, Pix, I am sorely tempted.
But I will resist.
Besides, Arsenal are favourites to finish above Wolves. I'm just thinking how hilarious it would be if they overtake you. Like we have, mate.
Not every bit of bantz has to be reduced to a wager, yeah.