Unpopular opinions

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Archers Road said:
Yeah, that wasn’t The Who mate, sorry. Half of them were dead by then.

Just as Led Zep weren’t Led Zep without John Bonham.
Click to expand...

Well, one of them was dead.

The other three were very much there.

I take your point though, in that it certainty wasn't The Who as you'd hope to see them.
 
Archers Road said:
Everyone is entitled to their opinions, of course. But some opinions are just plain wrong.

No one who has listened to The Stones back catalogue thinks they were ****. Same with Prince. So anyone who says they were, is being wilfully ignorant. In my opinion.
Click to expand...

Why would anybody who doesn’t like something listen to their entire back catalogue?

Imagine not liking fish and somebody says to you that you have to eat every fish before you’re entitled to say you don’t like fish.

Both utter ****e. IMOOC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
I like fish. Well some fish. Pretty much all fish that's white when cooked. Not salmon, but that's not white.

[HASHTAG]#racist[/HASHTAG]

P.S. don't like octupus either
 
Chief said:
I think it weird when people say The Beatles were ****. It's as if it makes them uber edgy to say it.

The clearly weren't ****, they were brilliant and pioneers of their time. They also evolved into great musicians and were prolific in their output.

Rightly seen as one of the best bands.
Click to expand...

Music is subjective. I can appreciate that the Beatles were pioneers and very successful, but their music, in my opinion, is utterly dreadful. I reckon I would turn over the radio for probably all but 2 or 3 of their songs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Tel said:
Music is subjective. I can appreciate that the Beatles were pioneers and very successful, but their music, in my opinion, is utterly dreadful. I reckon I would turn over the radio for probably all but 2 or 3 of their songs.
Click to expand...

Different era's mate, the stuff you listen to for me is ****e but it suits your era in this age. I hated Vera Lynn, my mother thought she was great in her era. If we all liked the same then the world would stand still..<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole, Spurlock, Tel (they/them) and 1 other person
J๏E.. said:
Different era's mate, the stuff you listen to for me is ****e but it suits your era in this age. I hated Vera Lynn, my mother thought she was great in her era. If we all liked the same then the world would stand still..<ok>
Click to expand...

I do like a fair bit of older music as well like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Treble said:
Spurs are a great side worthy of success and silverware.






























Bahahaa who am I kidding <rofl>
Click to expand...

Not sure if it's a popular or unpopular opinion but:

There's no such thing as being worthy of silverware. You win it or you don't.
 
Tel said:
Why would anybody who doesn’t like something listen to their entire back catalogue?

Imagine not liking fish and somebody says to you that you have to eat every fish before you’re entitled to say you don’t like fish.

Both utter ****e. IMOOC.
Click to expand...


So if you haven't listened to their back catalogue, you are, as I said, speaking from a position of ignorance. You're criticising something you know nothing about.
 
Archers Road said:
So if you haven't listened to their back catalogue, you are, as I said, speaking from a position of ignorance. You're criticising something you know nothing about.
Click to expand...

No mate, usually to form an opinion on something you have to sample enough of their material to make a decision.

Let’s say you think Drake is ****, is that because you’ve listened to every one of his songs, or is it because you’ve heard two or three or is it because you don’t particularly like the genre so think it’s all ****?

Deal with it mate, it’s opinion, you can’t have facts like the one you’re trying to make up.
 
Tel said:
No mate, usually to form an opinion on something you have to sample enough of their material to make a decision.

Let’s say you think Drake is ****, is that because you’ve listened to every one of his songs, or is it because you’ve heard two or three or is it because you don’t particularly like the genre so think it’s all ****?

Deal with it mate, it’s opinion, you can’t have facts like the one you’re trying to make up.
Click to expand...

Quite like sone drake songs
 
  • Like
Reactions: J๏E.. and Tel (they/them)
Tel said:
No mate, usually to form an opinion on something you have to sample enough of their material to make a decision.

Let’s say you think Drake is ****, is that because you’ve listened to every one of his songs, or is it because you’ve heard two or three or is it because you don’t particularly like the genre so think it’s all ****?

Deal with it mate, it’s opinion, you can’t have facts like the one you’re trying to make up.
Click to expand...


I don't think Drake is ****. I'm not really interested in listening to him, so I don't really have an opinion.

I'm not really interested in Beethoven or Mozart either. But I don't dismiss them as "****e", because that would be ignorant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chief and J๏E..
Archers Road said:
I don't think Drake is ****. I'm not really interested in listening to him, so I don't really have an opinion.

I'm not really interested in Beethoven or Mozart either. But I don't dismiss them as "****e", because that would be ignorant.
Click to expand...

So you don’t think any music is ****e then unless you’ve heard it all?

Most people don’t decide these things the same way you do bro.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back