Yeah Jeselnik can be brutal and there was a joke I remember I wasn’t fond of, like all comedy for me it’s the intent behind it, and Jeselnik makes his real thoughts fairly clear.
pff, The Stones only made two records worth listening to, Sympathy for the Devil & Paint it Black; Prince I'm struggling to find one.
That's the popular crap, Play with Fire, Lets Spend The Night Together, Ruby Tuesday all better. The Stones were actually good in the late 60's and early 70's
Lads it's unpopular opinions. If a man thinks the stones are **** then let him so say without recriminations.
From the first album and for 10 years, yeah I'd go with that I know I said late 60's but that was from memory and me thinking the first was 67 but it was 64 and pretty much everything was good through to 74 for me before it goes downhill. So I agree. Don't know how anyone can not like this...
Everyone is entitled to their opinions, of course. But some opinions are just plain wrong. No one who has listened to The Stones back catalogue thinks they were ****. Same with Prince. So anyone who says they were, is being wilfully ignorant. In my opinion.
I think the main problem with the Stones is that Mick Jagger is a terrible singer. If they had a better lead man a lot of their songs would be a lot better. Paint it Black, Ruby Tuesday, and Honkey Tonk Women my top three Stones songs.
