Unpopular opinions

[Willhoops]

Yeah Anthony is very good. Brutal at times

He has had some hard times too with some of what he says.

With comedy, which I'm a huge fan of, I like to unwind and just laugh mostly. Stewart needs more care and attention than I'm willing to give, depending on mood

If you like jeselnik you may like Patrice O'Neal and Daniel tosh early stuff.

Yeah Jeselnik can be brutal and there was a joke I remember I wasn’t fond of, like all comedy for me it’s the intent behind it, and Jeselnik makes his real thoughts fairly clear.

 

[Big Ern]

Just fishing mate ... I've actually got quite an eclectic taste when it comes to music ... but some **** had the nerve to criticise the Stones and Prince ... so I thought I'd stir the pot ...

pff, The Stones only made two records worth listening to, Sympathy for the Devil & Paint it Black; Prince I'm struggling to find one.

 

[Matth_2014]

Junk food is better than eating vegetables.

 

[Matth_2014]

Today’s music is crap.

 

[Willhoops]

Wasps are ****ing pointless

 

[Big Ern]

Junk food is better than eating vegetables.

hmm, diet is important for mood, maybe that's your problem right there.

 

[PINKIE]

Today’s music is crap.

What about yesterday’s or tomorrow’s ?

 

[Milk not bear jizz]

Today’s music is crap.

Most of it.

 

[Archers Road]

I'd have to agree that Prince was ****e.

I’d have to point out that this opinion is absurd

 

[luvgonzo]

Today’s music is crap.

Utter nonsense.

 

[luvgonzo]

pff, The Stones only made two records worth listening to, Sympathy for the Devil & Paint it Black; Prince I'm struggling to find one.

That's the popular crap, Play with Fire, Lets Spend The Night Together, Ruby Tuesday all better. The Stones were actually good in the late 60's and early 70's

 

[Archers Road]

pff, The Stones only made two records worth listening to, Sympathy for the Devil & Paint it Black; Prince I'm struggling to find one.

Exile on Main Street

Sign O’ The Times

Two ****ing masterpiece albums right there.

 

[Archers Road]

That's the popular crap, Play with Fire, Lets Spend The Night Together, Ruby Tuesday all better. The Stones were actually good in the late 60's and early 70's

The Stones were ****ing brilliant for at least 10 years mate.

 

[thefanwithnoname]

Lads it's unpopular opinions. If a man thinks the stones are **** then let him so say without recriminations.

 

[luvgonzo]

The Stones were ****ing brilliant for at least 10 years mate.

From the first album and for 10 years, yeah I'd go with that I know I said late 60's but that was from memory and me thinking the first was 67 but it was 64 and pretty much everything was good through to 74 for me before it goes downhill. So I agree.

Don't know how anyone can not like this...

You must log in or register to see media

 

[luvgonzo]

Lads it's unpopular opinions. If a man thinks the stones are **** then let him so say without recriminations.

**** no!

 

[thefanwithnoname]

**** no!

Sorry fella but it's in the OP so needs respecting



*As if

 

[Archers Road]

Sorry fella but it's in the OP so needs respecting



*As if

Everyone is entitled to their opinions, of course. But some opinions are just plain wrong.

No one who has listened to The Stones back catalogue thinks they were ****. Same with Prince. So anyone who says they were, is being wilfully ignorant. In my opinion.

 

[Milk not bear jizz]

I think the main problem with the Stones is that Mick Jagger is a terrible singer. If they had a better lead man a lot of their songs would be a lot better.

Paint it Black, Ruby Tuesday, and Honkey Tonk Women my top three Stones songs.

 

[luvgonzo]

I think the main problem with the Stones is that Mick Jagger is a terrible singer. If they had a better lead man a lot of their songs would be a lot better.

This is the Unpopular Opinions thread so I supposed it's designed for nonsense like this.