The words ‘hissy’ and ‘fit’ spring to mind.
I’ve no idea why this is being reported so widely I really, really don’t. Broken down what it amounts to is an owner thinks his horse(s) is badly handicapped. This happens, even on a normal days racing, about 30 times! The handicapper assesses a horse and then the owner either (i) is very happy, (ii) is very sad or (iii) says they are very sad when really they are very happy! Some you like their marks, some you don’t. That is a fact of life and as they say ‘that’s racing’.
Also, what about all the countless number of runners he’s not withdrawing in the handicaps?!? That you could say is the real pertinent point, people. Do we therefore conclude these are wonderfully handicapped and should be punted accordingly??!
Oooh that puts me in mind of those cold war espionage stories with good old Bernard Samson with double agents and triple agents etc.
